May. 10th, 2023

canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (movies)
Recently I watched the 1981 movie Scanners. It's something of a cult classic, and it's been on my list of old movies to watch for a while. The movie spans the categories of science fiction and horror flicks. It's written and directed by David Cronenberg, who later directed (and has a screenplay writing credit for) scifi-horror crossover The Fly (1986). Scanners stars Patrick McGoohan, Steven Lack, Michael Ironside, and Jennifer O'Neill.

Scanners (1981) movie posterBTW, yes, this is the movie with the infamous exploding head scene. That one scene, shown in, like, every trailer for the movie, is a large part of its status as a cult classic.

The Premise

The premise of Scanners is that a small number of people, called Scanners, have telepathic power. When they "scan" a person it causes a bit of pain, like a headache and a nosebleed. But they can also use their power to control other people, forcing them to inflict harm on themselves, or cause physical harm directly through the telepathic link.

Scientists at one shadowy company are cultivating scanners to use as spies. When their best scanner is killed by another, more powerful scanner they realize that some other shadowy organization is working against them— and plans to take over the world with scanners. They recruit a troubled young man with scanner powers, Cameron Vale (played by Steven Lack), to infiltrate the rival organization and stop it.

What Works: The Mood

Watching Scanners reminded me, this is very much what movies looked like in 1981. It's not just the very-late 1970s fashion nor even the vaguely sinister architecture of new buildings at the time (the community college campus built near my childhood home around the time totally looked like one of those this-is-a-sinister-quasi-governmental-secret-lab places) but it's also the construction of how horror movies were horror.

The threat here is a combination of scientific research and mystical power. "Evil scientist" was a horror staple of the early 1980s as science was advancing rapidly compared to popular understanding. Basically, everything Boomer adults of the time had learned in high school was being rendered obsolete by the cutting edge of science and technology, and that scared them.

Also very early 1980s in feel is that the perpetrators of the threat are shadowy, quasi-governmental organizations. Today we'd say, Oh, those are DARPA funded labs and private military contractors (PMCs). Back then such affiliations were not well understood and seemed sinister. Plus, the use of such companies as bad guys was a common thing in film for several years after the Nixon Watergate scandal. In fictional stories, companies did evil things with government money while the government pretended not to know.

What Sucks: The Writing

The writing fell apart in the last third of the film. The plotting was okay through the beginning and the middle— not great, but okay especially for the standards of the time. Then in the third reel I was like, "WTF is this? WTF is that? How could those characters know X and not also know Y? Did the SFX people actually read the script before shooting that scene?"

As the credits rolled I said to myself, "It's like the writers couldn't quite figure out how to complete the story they started, so they all got high on cocaine then wrote whatever came to mind." Remember, this was 1981. Doing coke was totally a thing creatives in New York and LA did. Unfortunately coke-heads are wont to crap out a turd and convince themselves it's art.

The reality of the situation is that "the writers" was just one person, director/writer David Cronenberg. And he noted that he was on a very rushed schedule. For financial reasons they had to start filming before he finished the story. So it seems like there probably was an "Oh, shit" moment where he realized he needed to just write something to finish the story on time. And he was probably snorting coke, too. That's just the times.

canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
Liar-liar-pants-on-fire Rep. George Santos was arrested and indicted today on 13 criminal counts. Among other things, he's charged with fraud, money laundering, lying on financial disclosure forms, misusing campaign funds, and fraudulently obtaining COVID-19 relief funds. He has pleaded not guilty to everything.

I'm pleasantly surprised by today's charges. ...Surprised, because after the astonishing breadth of Santos's lies was revealed by investigative journalism it seemed the system was incapable of doing much about it. Republican leaders in Congress side-stepped taking any disciplinary action against him, passing off responsibility to a committee they just so happened to boot most of the Democrats off and hobble with no budget. While it was clear that no political action in Congress would be taken against Santos— though it easily could have been, and in the past has been for far lesser allegations than those leveled against Santos— it was unclear if, or how fast, legal action would be taken.

Santos, for his part, seized on the speed with which these charges were filed in an outrageous impromptu press conference he held after leaving court today. In a interview filled with sounds of guffaws and laughter from members of the press at his most egregious obvious lies, Santos called the charges a "witch hunt" (hmm, where have we heard that before?) and argued that they're all politically motivated lies. Nevermind that these "lies" are actually well supported by evidence, much of which is from public sources. Santos, further, tried to deflect attention from himself by charging that "the entire Biden family" are receiving illicit payments from unspecified foreigners. As the reporters starting laughing out loud at him he doubled down by claiming the facts of this have been widely reported. ...They haven't, of course. There are no credible facts of that happening. But hey, liars gonna lie.

canyonwalker: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles. Travel! (planes trains and automobiles)
It feels a bit late to do a retrospective on our trip to New Orleans, Mississippi, and Phoenix as we've been home for 10 days now. But considering I just finished pushing out my last backlogged blog entry from the trip (with part 3 of hiking the amazing Red Bluff canyon) it's not a day too soon. Plus, some things in retrospect are clearer with the benefit of time's perspective. Here are Five Things about the trip:

  • Length: just right. We conceived this trip as 10 days, taking off from work a Friday and all of the following week. That's frankly as long as we've ever taken off in our working lives in corporate America. When we chose to shuffle parts of the trip only a week ahead of time we seriously considered cutting it shorter by several days and giving back two vacation days. I'm glad we didn't. 10 days was the right amount of time to see and do several things, mostly forget about work while we were doing it, and yet not come back to everything gone haywire.

  • Staying in the French Quarter: nice. We faced lots of choices about where to stay in New Orleans. We decided early on "Let's stay right in the French Quarter" but when looking at price/value tradeoffs on hotels we considered a number of alternatives on the edge or a few blocks away. Ultimately staying in the 'quarter just 1 block from Bourbon Street was a good choice. It was so close to everything yet just far enough from the hubbub that the hotel was always a quiet oasis when we wanted it.

  • Dropping the beach for Phoenix worked. When we made the choice to cut out 4 nights at the beach I wondered if any of the trip was still worth doing. We landed on the plan of replacing 4 nights on the beach with 3 nights at a resort in Phoenix but I had regrets the morning after booking it. The beach would've been no fun with the cooler weather on tap. We've got a better beach trip coming up soon now anyway. And Phoenix turned out to be a great piece in the combination.

  • Pacing: slower days were important. The first several days of the trip felt very go-go-go. By the time we got to Phoenix I was ready to slow down. Fortunately that's what our resort stay provided. We were just steps from the waterpark at the hotel, and we could come and go as we pleased during broad hours. Relaxing on a chaise lounge by the water or on a chair in our roomy suite were both great options. A key was that when I wanted to take it easy, I wasn't just relaxing but relaxing in relative luxury.

  • Renting a car in Phoenix was the right choice. We didn't rent a car for our 4 days in New Orleans. It didn't make sense, as a) most of what we wanted to do was walkable and b) parking was stupid expensive. I hesitated to rent in Phoenix. Our friends insisted they'd just Uber/Lyft everywhere and it'd be cost effective. I did quick mental arithmetic and figured that if we wanted to make even one trip per day it'd be close to even. And we wound up making a lot more trips than that. Especially for our friends who had lots of "I need this... oh now I need that" special requests. And having a car meant we weren't stuck with eating at the hotel for all our meals. That saved a lot of money right there as even modest lunches would've been upwards of $30 apiece. Plus we enjoyed way more variety than the hotel's safe-for-visitors-from-Iowa style menu.



Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 27th, 2025 08:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios