Both lenses are mid-range zooms. "The Brick" was a 16-55mm f/2.8 zoom. My new lens is 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6.
Beyond the slight difference in zoom range and constant vs. variable aperture, the lenses are built to different standards. "The Brick" was built to pro standards and weighed a ton. The replacement is a kit lens and is very compact.
One feature the kit lens does have that the brick lacked is optical image stabilization. I find that more useful than the big lens's faster aperture. When I'm shooting in low light I might have my exposure as slow as 1/30 second all the way to 1/4 second. IS makes the 1/30 sec shots fairly reliable and the faster ones still worthwhile.
no subject
Beyond the slight difference in zoom range and constant vs. variable aperture, the lenses are built to different standards. "The Brick" was built to pro standards and weighed a ton. The replacement is a kit lens and is very compact.
One feature the kit lens does have that the brick lacked is optical image stabilization. I find that more useful than the big lens's faster aperture. When I'm shooting in low light I might have my exposure as slow as 1/30 second all the way to 1/4 second. IS makes the 1/30 sec shots fairly reliable and the faster ones still worthwhile.