Date: 2020-12-25 03:37 am (UTC)
jnovak: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jnovak
Quite honestly, we need more judges with STEM training as well-- and for the purposes of this discussion let's not consider economics as any kind of a science. I know it's a crazy idea, but maybe we'd stop getting really stupid tech decisions if some meaningful fraction of the judiciary had some real knowledge of the field.

I don't know how you manage to wedge significant amounts of science and engineering training on top of the level of schooling and experience necessary to get a law degree and then a position on the bench, though.

(And, without meaning to dump on the medical field at all, Rand Paul is not even on the list of people that comes to my mind as STEM oriented. Some doctors, especially but not limited to research physicians, are scientists. Some are just highly trained professionals. Honestly you can make exactly the same statement about engineers, when you get right down to it.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 08:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios