Mar. 25th, 2023

canyonwalker: Cheers! (wine tasting)
A few days ago I wrote about our resolution to try new restaurants. We actually made that resolution a few months ago. And even that wasn't the first time we've made such a resolution. Like widely unkept New Year resolutions to visit the gym twice a week it was made with good intentions but poor follow-through. A few of the failed starts for our try-new-restaurants resolution were understandable because Covid. Now that we're sort of past that* it's time it's time to stop make excuses.

The first new* restaurant I'll write about is Gumba's, an Italian restaurant right here in Sunnyvale, a fixture on Murphy Street downtown for... I don't know how many years. It seemed to be a local fixture already when I visited it on my first trip to Sunnyvale, a few months before moving here, in 1996.

That's right, Gumba's is not literally new to us. We've eaten there before. That's why I put a star next to "new" in the previous paragraph. But that's totally fair to our resolution. When I write "We're going to visit new restaurants" that's a short-hand for our actual resolution, which was "We're going to visit restaurants that are new to us or that we visited so long ago they might as well be new to us."

How might-as-well-be-new to us is Gumba's? I ate there several times in the late 1990s. I don't think I've eaten there since the early 00s, though— about 20 years now. Maybe we ate there last around 2005-2006? Either way, it's been a while.

So. We went again. We ate. How was it?

My first impression of Gumba's on our recent visit was "broken down and over the hill".

Gumba's Then & Now

Gumba's has always been a cramped restaurant on a historic street with old buildings. Years ago is was almost always a bustling restaurant. Whether you sat in the tiny main dining room, the slightly larger back dining room, or the al fresco tables on the sidewalk, it was crowded.

When a restaurant is bustling it's like the field of view narrows around you. The full tables halfway across the room blur into the background as you focus on what's in front of you: good food and good friends. Good times. That's how I remember Gumba's from 20+ years ago.

On the night we visited there were maybe 5 tables in play at the whole restaurant. The sparsity revealed how the Gumba's is only a dusty shell of its former self.

Instead of the dining area feeling excitedly cramped with the hustle and bustle of full tables and waiters dodging every which way, it just felt cluttered. There was too much kitsch everywhere, like the restaurant was run not by a person wanting to convey a theme as much as by a hoarder. And so much of the dining area was taken up by overflowing crap such as extra chairs, stools, storage racks, etc. Really, the whole place screamed "hoarder".... or at least, "Grandma and Grandpa who can't throw anything away."

🎵 SIgn, Sign, Everywhere a Sign 🎵

Then there were the signs. There were signs everywhere. Signs with directions. And by "directions" I don't mean signs like "Venice 30km" to set the mood in an Italian restaurant. Gumba's is full of signs giving instructions to customers. ...Not just instructions but admonishments. ...Admonishments like, "If you do this thing we don't like, this is the consequence." There's a minimum order per person. Limit 1 refill on sodas and iced team. A limit on how long you can stay. Limits on other stuff, too. While many of these things, individually, are sensible business, putting them on signs sends a peculiar message. The message is that the owners view their customers with deep suspicion, that customers would all cheat them given any chance and so ground rules must be clearly established.

I don't feel like eating again at a restaurant where the owners regard me as a likely nuisance.

And the Food?

The food, by the time it came, was frankly beside the point. We were all but certain not to come back. Not to a trying-too-hard Italian restaurant full of clutter, crap, and written warnings.

It helped, though, that the food was... fair. Just fair. It was middle-of-the-road, standard fare for an Italian-American restaurant.

FWIW our waiter offered to sneak us an unpermitted extra refill on our glasses of iced tea. We turned him down, not wanting to get in trouble— or him get in trouble— in case the senile paranoid owner was watching on a hidden spycam or something.



canyonwalker: My other car is a pair of hiking boots (in beauty I walk)
This weekend we decided to visit Zim Zim Falls. It's in remote Napa County, a few miles north of Lake Berryessa. We'd mentally bookmarked it for a visit some Spring season when there'd been good rainfall followed by a sunny day. Well, we've had epic rainfall this season. After the most recent rain squall a few days ago this weekend's weather forecast is sun and blue skies. Time to get out!

Zim Zim Falls is a place you have to really want to go to get there. For us, at least it's nearly a 3 hour drive from home, making it a day-trip that requires planning. We set our alarms for 7am and left home a bit after 8:30. The real challenges start as you approach the trailhead. The road up from Lake Berryessa narrows to a single lane and traverses several water crossings. These crossings would be no sweat in our Nissan Xterra 4x4, but today we drove our BMW convertible. Watch an example of how it went:



...Haha, Hawk is joking in the video about her feet getting wet inside the car. The truth is I know what I'm doing when fording water like this, and I can do it safely in cars that other people would have trouble in.

There were 4 or 5 crossings like this before we got to the trailhead. Yes, it's way out in remote country.

Once the driving part of the trip is complete the hiking part presents its own challenges. Yup, more water crossings!



This was the first water crossing, about ¼ mile in from the trailhead. We took off our boots and socks and carefully made our way across, then dried our feet and put our socks and boots back on on the other side. It was time consuming, but we figured having dry feet was worth it.

Well, then we found the second water crossing. I remembered there were probably going to be five crossings total (each way). We considered whether to do the boots-and-socks thing again or just quit. Like I said, seeing Zim Zim Falls is something you have to want to do! And we did want to do it. So we tried crossing with our boots and sock on. ...And yup, we got wet. But then we discovered it's not so bad.

Here's a clip of our fifth water crossing:



There would ultimately be NINE water crossings to get to the falls— each way! Plus countless mud bogs on the trail. At some point we realized there was no way to hike this trail today while also keeping our feet dry and our boots not covered with mud. Once we stopped caring it was so much easier!

Eventually we reached Zim Zim Falls. ...Well, not the falls themselves but an awesome vantage point from atop a rocky perch partway up the canyon on the opposite side of the creek.



Zim Zim Falls is well over 100 ft. tall. It's the biggest falls in the Bay Area. And right now the flow over the falls is stunning.

The way back to the trailhead went much faster than the hike in. That's typical, though in this case it was doubly true because on the way out we spent absolutely no time being worried about wet or muddy boots. We had towels and clean shoes and socks back at the car!

Link: view video on YouTube

We were ready to roll around 4pm. It would be over an hour until we were back in civilization— by which I mean a place with restaurants for dinner! We ate in Fairfield and then drove home. We were back at our own place before 8pm. That was pretty good timing for a full day trip!



Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 10:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios