Date: 2023-08-09 05:02 am (UTC)
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
From: [personal profile] canyonwalker
I think this is actually the classification system for automobile insurance claims, and it's poor. I challenged the insurance adjuster on the categorization. "I didn't hit a stationary object," I explained. "A piece of debris bounced up from the road and struck the underside of my vehicle, damaging it."

The adjuster explained that there is a classification for "Debris struck moving vehicle" but it's limited to things like rocks damaging the windshield. To me that's an arbitrary and misleading restriction. It's misleading because it uses common English words in ways contrary to how any reasonable person would understand them, and because the same plain reading of the words implies the driver is responsible for causing the accident.

But what can I do? I don't get to negotiate terms with them. It's a take-it-or-leave-it proposition. And "leave it" really isn't even an option, as owning car insurance is required by law. So I can take it or... take it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 06:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios