canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
On a quick errand to CVS this weekend I saw an interesting display: a life-sized, Black Santa doll.

Life-size Black Santa doll at CVS (Dec 2023)

They also had a female Black Santa doll, though it wasn't 6 feet tall.

Black female Santa doll at CVS (Dec 2023)

These got me thinking, what did Santa— the real Santa, aka Saint Nicholas— look like?

There was a real Saint Nicholas. He was a Christian bishop in the 3rd and 4th century CE, in the city of Myra, which is today Demre, Turkey. He was born to a Greek family, though possibly in another nearby city that's also part of modern-day Turkey.

I mention Nicholas's ancestry because as a Greek he probably wasn't Black. He probably wouldn't have been white, either, or at least not what is often thought of as white. The popularized modern images we have of Santa Claus were created in the 19th century in North America, drawing heavily from northern European yule traditions. The modern concept of Santa Claus is actually way more tied to Odin than a Greek guy born in Turkey.

So, what would a Greek guy born in Turkey have looked like? The oldest art piece I found in a search, a religious painting from the 11th century CE, depicts him as light brown. How accurate is that? It's 700 years later, so the artist was likely working from his understanding of what people from Turkey tend to look like combined with some amount of his own cultural norms.

Another painting I found from the 13th century shows Saint Nicholas a bit lighter but still about the color of cork. A few examples of non-Western art from the 14th through 18th centuries depict him as much darker. Some Western art from the 18th century depicts him as light skinned Greek.

Any of these could be accurate, though I imagine the first two, with a light brown or olive skin tone, are the best estimates. Other Western art as far back as the 14th century depicts Saint Nicholas with a pale, northern European complexion. That's almost certainly inaccurate.
canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
In recent news about Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Turkey dropped its opposition to Sweden joining NATO.

"LOLWUT?" you might ask. "How is Turkey's opposition to Sweden joining an alliance a matter of Russia's war on Ukraine?"

The fact is, Sweden's effort to join NATO is entirely about Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Sweden, like its neighbor Finland, was happy to remain politically neutral outside of NATO for decades. Russia's (second) incursion, which started early last year, set alarm bells ringing, swinging enough popular support behind joining the Western alliance. Finland gained a clear path to join NATO in March.

Permission to join NATO requires unanimous approval from its member countries. Turkey was the last to grant approval for Finland's bid earlier this year. They demanded, and got, concessions to classify rebels opposing the autocratic rule of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as terrorists. Turkey demanded similar concessions of Sweden, which just recently granted them.... But then, in the past week, Turkey added to its demands. It wants EU membership, too.

Diplomatic negotiations managed to unblock Sweden's bid to join NATO from waiting for EU membership for Turkey. Sweden did promise to support it, it seems. Frankly I'm opposed to Turkey joining the EU. The EU is not just about geography or free trade but about shared political bedrock values. Turkey has become a sham democracy. Yes, there's voting, yes there's a parliament and a judiciary, but President Erdogan has refashioned all of them, plus the country's laws, to support his authoritarian rule.

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 05:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios