canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
Today I returned a small headset I bought on Amazon.com. Volume control didn't work with my computer. What good is a headset that has two volumes, 10/10 LOUD and (silent)? I started the return process online two nights ago, which was easy; and today I dropped off the box at the Amazon return counter at Whole Foods when I visited the store to buy a few groceries. The whole thing was easy, even— or especially— dropping off the item the counter. I scanned the return code, the desk agent took the box and applied a sticker to it, and I was done. It all went so fast it was like I barely stopped walking. "Well, half the stuff on Amazon nowadays is crap," I mused, "But at least returns are easy!"

Wait, crap?

Yeah, that's become the sad reality of shopping on Amazon. So much of what's there is cheap knockoffs from overseas, deliberately misleading descriptions, fake reviews, or all of the above.

The problem of deliberately misleading descriptions bit us a few months ago when Hawk ordered a set of pool noodles that were the size of... actual noodles. Social media is full of stories about people getting ridiculous miniatures or low-quality versions of what they thought they ordered. Yes, it's important to read descriptions carefully. This episode illustrates how even normally careful shoppers can be rooked occasionally. Shopping becomes a lot more of a effort when you have to practice extreme skepticism, basically asking yourself, "Okay, how is this seller trying to rip me off?" on everyday items.

Fake reviews compound the problem with misleading product descriptions. "Oh, but fake reviews are easy to spot!" some people will say. Yeah, ten years ago fake reviews were (often) easy to spot. Now they're a lot more pernicious. And platforms seem to have given up on trying to remove them. Arguably they (the platforms) don't even want to fight vendors over fake reviews since the vendors are their actual, paying customers. It's the enshittification problem. But at least the shit's easy to return.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Yesterday was Amazon Prime Day. Time to get my shopping on, right? Here's the main thing I bought:

My goodies from Amazon Prime (Oct 2024)

They were on sale so I bought two. Woohoo, Amazon Prime Day!

canyonwalker: My other car is a pair of hiking boots (in beauty I walk)
On a hiking trip two weeks ago I broke my hiking pole. (I fell over a waterfall and snapped it in two on the way down!) I started looking for a replacement the next day. Local outdoors stores didn't have the sort of pole I enjoy using, and the nearest REI with one in stock was almost 2 hours away. I decided to order online.

A pair of new hiking poles. I kept one, returned the other. (Sep 2024)Online I found two poles that seemed like what I want. One's a REI brand pole that's the most direct replacement to, but not an exact replacement, for the one I broke. The other is an ALPS brand pole I found selling on Amazon.

Which is better? I decided after poring over the tech specs that I couldn't be sure until I held them in my hands, so I ordered both. They arrived in the mail last week. I finally had time to unbox them Sunday.

You can see in the picture (right/above) that the two poles are similar in a number of ways. They're both collapsible/telescoping, and they both have rounded handles at the top— instead of the "pistol grip" or ski pole style grip that's more common with hiking poles. This was a key feature to me, as I when I'm using the pole for balance on tricky terrain I like to push straight down with the palm of my hand on the smooth pommel rather push my weight down through a bent wrist grasping a trigger-like handle.

Also, both poles have exterior clamps for locking the telescoping mechanism in place. This is different from the internal locking mechanism my old pole had. I liked the internal mechanism. It was an elegant design, giving the pole a clean profile without knobby bits that catch on a pants leg or tree branch. Alas it seems like no poles use that design anymore. I can only surmise it was more expensive to manufacture, wasn't as durable, or both.

The poles are not exactly the same, of course. The REI hiking pole I selected has an olive green shaft, while the ALPS pole is a neutral gray. I really liked the blue of the pole I lost, but that color isn't offered anywhere. Gray is dull, but I'm really not a fan of the green.

The REI pole is shorter by a few inches when collapsed, as you can see in the photo. That could be a big benefit when packing it in a suitcase for air travel. Among the tests I did Sunday was to lay both poles in our checked airline bag. Even the larger ALPS pole fits fine.

The pommels of the two poles are different. ALPS has rounded wood top, REI has a slightly shaped cork handle. I thought I'd prefer the cork by a lot— my busted pole had a cork handle, and I loved it— but upon trying them out the wood handle seemed. Plus, I salvaged the cork pommel from my old hiking pole... I can unscrew the ALPS pole's wood cap and screw on my old cork pommel!

One little difference that kind of pissed me off is that the REI pole doesn't come with a rubberized foot cap for use on hard surfaces. It's got a chisel point. REI sells foot caps for several dollars extra. The ALPS pole costs half the price of the REI and comes with a foot cap included.

At this point you probably won't be surprised that I chose to keep the ALPS pole and return the REI pole. The main reason was the cost— REI was 2x the price. And the ALPS pole included the foot cap and seemed to have a slightly heavier duty construction. Fortunately, returns are easy with REI. There's a store less than 2 miles from our house. We walked it in there and had a cash-in-hand refund minutes later.

canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
A few months ago someone left a pair of pool noodles in our HOA's swimming pool. Y'know, pool noodles, those tube-shaped foam floats that are 4-5 feet long and a few inches in diameter. I don't know about others using the pool, but Hawk and I have certainly enjoyed grabbing a noodle to float around after exercising in the water during our many afternoons in the pool this summer.

The floats are wearing out, though. One noodle has broken into two pieces, and with both of them the closed cell foam is starting to degrade so that they don't float as well anymore. We figured we'd do a solid for the community and buy a few new noodles ourselves to leave out for everyone's enjoyment.

That brings me to the second half of the title of this post. There have been lots of funny pictures/stories on social media lately of people being scammed by buying miniature versions of things online. Like, a woman buys a skirt, cheap, and what arrives barely fits on her cat. Or buys a desk, cheap, and what arrives is a dollhouse-sized desk only a few inches across.

"Always check the size first," I chuckle to myself every time, "And don't believe a price that's too good to be true."

Now with that context I'll bet you can guess what happened next...

Pool noodles the size of... actual noodles 🤣 (Jul 2024)

Yup, Hawk ordered a set of pool noodles at a fantastic price. It was, like, $6 for a set of 6. I thought they'd cost about $5 apiece. What a bargain! And what arrived were... pool noodles that are only 1 foot long instead of the 4-5 foot size we'd expected. These pool noodles are the length of... actual noodles! I've bought boxes of lasagna noodles bigger than this. 🤣

The good news is that these should be easy to return, since we bought them on Amazon. I still wonder, though... why does this product even exist? I can't think of why anyone would want pool noodles— and they are specifically labeled as pool noodles— this small. They're not useful for anything. I wonder if they're sold primarily to scam un-careful shoppers? Though that doesn't make much sense as long as returns are cheap and easy for the buyer.

Update: It turns out the noodles are NOT returnable. THAT is how this scammer makes money!


canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
I was surprised a few weeks ago when Amazon delivered one of my orders in just 14 hours. Surprisingly they gave me rush delivery for free. The package came in a first-of-the-morning type delivery, when all the rest of the time the Amazon trucks are in our neighborhood between 6-8pm every day (I hear their silly backing-up buzzers). Ironically that was one order I actually didn't need or want for 3 more weeks. Well, today Amazon beat their own record. I just got a package same-day, delivered a mere 9 hours 3 minutes after I ordered it.

Again, I wasn't expecting it that fast. I wouldn't have minded if it arrived Monday. And they didn't even tell me it would arrive that fast until after I ordered. At order time they offered free next-day shipping. I figured, "Why not?" Then, after I placed the order around 8:30 this morning, they updated the delivery estimate to 5-10pm today. It landed on my doorstep around 5:30pm.



canyonwalker: WTF? (wtf?)
Yesterday afternoon I ordered an item on Amazon. Fast shipping with a delivery date/time this morning was offered for free through Prime. As there seemed to be no point to waiting longer, and in some cases literally paying to wait longer, I took the free-fast delivery. Indeed the package arrived at my doorstep this morning at 8am... just 14 hours after I completed the order last night.

This leaves me wondering why. Why did Amazon offer such fast shipping on this item?

I know that likely a big part of the answer is not "why" by how. How it got here fast is apparently that it came from nearby. The shipping records don't indicate where the Amazon warehouse was, but an email notification at 2:27am said that it had left the warehouse, and a shipping record timestamp at 4:51am said it had arrived at the carrier's facility ~10 miles away from me.

But still, there seems to have been some intentionality on Amazon's part to expediting this shipping. Nearly everything I've gotten delivered by Amazon (I mean specifically via their in-house delivery service) for the past several years has arrived between 6-8pm. Basically we're near the end of the drivers' route. But this time the delivery left the carrier facility at 6:33am— which is about when 8pm arrivals go out on a truck, too— and landed on my doorstep at 8am. Apparently this order was given priority.

This wasn't a big order, BTW. It wasn't like, "Oooh, this guy's buying thousands of dollars of stuff, let's treat him right!" I ordered a small item that cost under $30 all-in. And ironically I didn't even care if this one came fast. It's a consumable item I use regularly. I ordered the refill 2-3 weeks before my current supply runs out— because, in the past, it's occasionally taken 7-10 days to ship. Except this time, when I was in no rush, it's like Amazon moved heaven and earth to deliver in 14 hours.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Two weeks ago I ordered a ream of printer paper on Amazon. The last ream I had lasted for several years, so I didn't think about how low it was getting until it ran out. I ordered a new ream hoping it'd arrive in time for some stuff I needed to print.

Amazon shipped the paper promptly. Yay, Amazon and free prime shipping! But then the shipper handed it off to the Post Office because they were oversubscribed, and that delayed it two days. Boo, shippers not caring about me because I'm not actually their customer.

When the paper finally arrived I cleared a space on the shelf under the printer to place it... and saw another ream of paper, still sealed in its wrapper, already waiting there. Somehow I'd failed to see a whole ream of paper hiding on that shelf when the other sheaf ran out!

"Do you think Amazon will accept a return on a ream of paper?" Hawk and I asked each other.

"It doesn't hurt to try," we agreed.

A few days ago I gave it a try. To my surprise Amazon offered a "Non-return refund". At first when I read that phrase I thought they were rejecting my return request but as I read it again I found they were actually super-accepting it. Amazon refunded my money and told me just to keep the product!
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Hawk and I have bought a new bed mattress. Our old one, really not even that old at just over 8 years now, developed a sag in one side and needed to be replaced.

First store: Good mattress, but it's $3,000

We began our mattress shopping on a whim. The weekend before last we were out getting lunch on Sunday (this is after coming home Saturday night from our aborted Bassi Falls trip) and said, "Hey, there's a mattress store across the street, let's stop there and look around." We stopped in, and with the help of a reasonably knowledge store manager immediately picked a short-list of mattresses to try. All were at least close to what we wanted. One, a particular Stearns & Foster model, was on the money. Speaking of money, there was good news and bad news. Good news: it wasn't the most expensive mattress in the store. Bad news: it was still $3,000 for queen size.

Checking online: Seemingly credible options from $600

During the week I spent a bit of time shopping online. On Amazon I found seemingly credible options from $600. That's obviously way cheaper than $3000. The thing is we can afford $3k if that's what it takes for the right mattress, but the $2,400 difference is real money to us. We're not that well off! Moreover, when there's a 5-to-1 price range even after crossing off the cheapest and priciest products it demands careful shopping to understand what differences lie beneath such disparate prices.

I scoured through product listings on Amazon and cross-referenced them with manufacturers' sites and third-party reviews sites. The first difference I found was, basically, foam mattresses vs. coil or coil-and-foam hybrid mattresses. We knew from trying a foam mattress at the first store that we both hate their feel. Alas, they are less expensive. But knowing they're also the wrong thing for us made it easier to cross off the cheapest products.

The next thing I checked was the price of name-brand mattresses online. Are brick-and-mortar stores like the one we visited gouging with huge markups? Actually they're not. The big name manufacturers regulate the pricing so you see the same price online as in stores.

That still left a bunch of lesser-known brands of coil based mattresses priced well below $3,000, like half or less. The challenge there is that we're both sensitive enough to what we need in a mattress that we're unwilling to buy without testing it first. So back to other brick-and-mortar shops we went.

Second store: Similar mattresses, snotty salesguy

This past Saturday we tried another local store after lunch. There are basically 2 chains that run basically all the standalone mattress stores nowadays. We went to the one that's not the one we checked the previous weekend. For being a different brand store, the selection was pretty similar. That kind of makes sense as most of their selection is the same handful of big-name brands. Pricing was the same.

We were more serious about buying a mattress on Saturday than the weekend before— we decided we would "Buy It Now" for the right product at a fair price— so we asked more questions of the salesguy who helped us. At first he was helpful, then he seemed to be avoiding us, then he started negging us. Negging, as in giving snide or critical answers to reasonable questions we asked, clearly implying with his words and intonation that we were foolish for asking.

Fuck. That. Shit.

We left.

Third Store's a Charm!

Having effectively visited dozens of area mattress stores by sampling one each of the two chains I next looked for independent stores. I found one 5 miles away, so we went there next. It had lesser-known brand name mattresses at lower prices. But they were on display so we could test them. We found one that provided all the firm support we need in a mattress, at a price less than half the $3k mattress we liked at the first store. And, the store owner who helped us was knowledgeable and patient with answering all of our questions. We not only bought a mattress from him but started eyeing a replacement bed frame and a new dining room set, too!

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Hawk and I have enjoyed watching The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, an original TV series streaming on Amazon Prime. Just recently the 5th and final season dropped. ...Well, recently may be a misnomer. It dropped on April 14, and though we've been waiting more than two years for season 5 (season 4 came out in Feb 2021) we were so busy in April and May that we only just noticed it finally was available a few days ago.

The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, season 5 streaming on Amazon Prime (Jun 2023)Season 5 is the show's final season. Showrunner Amy Palladino and Amazon have both been clear about that. Palladino also acknowledged that the show was spinning out too far from its original narrative arc— see my criticism after watching Season 3— and pledged that season 5 will focus more tightly on the title character, "Midge" Maisel, and her struggles to balance building a show business career with her family and society's patriarchal expectations of a woman circa 1960.

So, how does season 5 do? Well, first, I've only watched 5 of the 9 episodes so far. (In two days, though!) Second, I'm going to keep this spoiler-free.

Many of the episodes in s5 start with a flash-forward. We see a scene with Midge, her (grown) children, and/or her ex-husband Joel 20 years later.

I think these flash-forwards are a mistake. On the one hand they tell intriguing vignettes of where Midge and the minor characters landed 20 years later. On the other hand they continue the show's weakness of introducing new subplots that stray too far from the main narrative story of Midge's rise and struggle. Also, while all the minor characters are convincingly "aged up" 20 years, either with makeup or by being recast with older actors, Midge does not look 20 years older, and that's very jarring.

As for the main body of the episodes... the jury's still out. The show continues with very high production values. There's always been beautiful staging and costumes. The characters are all interesting and well acted. And the script continues to be full of sharp, witty dialogue. It's so witty it actually becomes a suspension-of-disbelief problem. During S5E1 I paused the show to exclaim, "Is there anybody in this drama who is not a sharp-witted, sharp-tongued critic of everything around them?"

But... and you knew there was a "but" coming, right? Season 5 remains isn't fixing the spinning-out-of-control problem. It's still very enjoyable to watch, and it's spinning out fewer new subplots than seasons 3 and 4, but it's still keeping lots of plots spinning and introducing a few new ones, too. And the pacing is ponderous. At episode 5 little over a month has elapsed in the story of season 5. Again, the show is enjoyable to watch in the moment, but at the same time I grow increasingly skeptical that show will able to deliver in the remaining few episodes a satisfying and fitting dramatic conclusion to Mrs. Maisel's marvelous story.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Last weekend when I was searching for replacement parts for my electric shaver I found an interesting alternative to replacing some of the bits: a whole new shaver for $20! That was less than half the $47 for the replacement bits, let alone the $125 cost of buying a whole new shaver in a 12 year old design. (The more modern ones cost even more.) And, to boot, this shaver is small, a good size for travel.

I bought an inexpensive Japanese travel shaver (Jun 2023)

How small is small? Well, you can see it above in my hand. It's, like, barely 3 inches tall and less than 3/4 inch thick. It's not just American small, it's Japanese small. It's actually imported from Japan with most of the packaging printed in Japanese.

Obviously I bought one. I mean, it's obvious because I'm holding it. 😅 I figured, "Hey, for $20 I'll try it." If the replacement screen and blades I bought don't improve my 10 year old shaver, I could switch to this until I'm ready to invest in another more-expensive shaver. And this could be a good travel shaver. I could leave it in my bag so I don't have to remember to pack my shaver when I travel.

Why have a second shaver just for travel? Because having two sets of things is a technique that makes frequent travel easy. For years I've had two sets of my regular toiletries: hair brush, hair products, toothbrush, toothpaste. I keep the travel set with my bag. It's way easier than having to grab all sorts of things from the bathroom every time. I've never had two shavers, though. The main reason is I never wanted to spend another $75, $125, or more. But for $20? I'll try it.

How is it? I tried my first shave with it today. It shaves reasonably close when I have a light stubble. It's definitely good for everyday shaving or for fixing a 5 o'clock shadow. Reviews online said it's not so good with longer stubble. Maybe I'll give that a try this weekend. And there's no whisker trimmer on it, so it's not good for keeping sideburns sharp. That alone limits its use to maybe at most a 2-night trip for me. But like I said, I'll try it out. Worst case I'm out $20 plus tax.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
One of the oldest websites in my bookmarks list, a site I've been reading regularly for twenty-three years, has survived nearly being shut down. Earlier this year, DPReview.com, aka Digital Photography Review, announced its imminent closure. Amazon, its parent company since 2007, chose to close it as part of strategic reduction initiative begun late last year. Just recently it found a buyer to keep it going.

Digital Photography Review, DPReview.com

Reaction from the photography community to news in March of Amazon shuttering the site was immense. DPReview is an enormously popular website among photographers, a hub for both information about photography gear as well as lively discussion in dozens of forums it hosts. Nothing else in the space is as comprehensive.

Three Months in Zombie Mode

Amazon promised to keep DPReview.com up for a little while so contributors could archive their own writings. The thing was, how? And where? There is simply no alternative to the comprehensive site that DPReview.com built itself into years ago. Other sites in the space do only small bits of what DPReview did.

DPReview.com surprisingly continued on over the past few months. Even the site's news-and-reviews editorial content kept on. There was about a one week stop in news-and-reviews editorial content, then surprisingly it crept back to life. First there were best-of type articles, then new product reviews again. Meanwhile the forums, which we were warned would go read-only imminently and then disappear entirely, kept on going, too. What was happening?

A New Lease on Life

What I surmise was happening— since Amazon and DPReview are not telling us— is two-fold. One, Amazon realized that with the huge number of page views the site draws it's a money-maker. Maybe not as much of a moneymaker as Amazon wants but potentially enough for someone. Two, Amazon realized it would thus be better to sell it to someone rather than shut it down and write it off as a total loss, so they kept it going the few months it took to find a buyer and complete a sale.

DPReview.com is now owned by Gear Patrol. If you're like, "WTF is Gear Patrol?" I don't blame you. I've been reading DPReview.com for twenty-three years and even I don't know who they are. But I'm glad they stepped up to buy this great property and I look forward to continuing to visit it a few times a week.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Recently I noticed that my electric shaver hasn't been giving me as close of a shave as I expect. It's missing a lot of hairs even when I work it over the same spot on my face or neck a few times. It worked way better when it was new. That means it's time to throw it out and buy another one, right? Wrong! Key parts on electric shavers are replaceable!

I'm buying new parts for this 10 year old shaver (Jun 2023)There are two parts that can be replaced on many electric shavers, the blades and the screen. The screen is the mesh cover up at the top. Underneath it are the blades. The blades are the cutting tool, and they oscillate back and forth rapidly via the electric motor. They naturally dull over time and don't cut as closely. The screen covers the blades so they don't touch your skin. When the screen wears down it can result in the blades getting too close, causing skin abrasion, or not getting close enough, causing less effective trimming.

I looked up the model number on Amazon. The first thing I saw is that I can buy a new one of the same model for $125. That seemed like waaay more than I paid years ago. Out of curiosity I clicked through the link... and on the product page Amazon helpfully told me, "You last purchased this item in 2013." Wow, 10 years!

I searched my 2013 orders and found that I originally bought this shaver for $75. First of all, wow, I thought I spent way less than that. I usually buy an inexpensive shaver because I don't need fancy features. Though ISTR choosing the Panasonic even though it was more expensive than certain other brands because I'd had a good experience with a previous Panasonic after poor experiences with 2-3 other major brands. Second, $125 today vs. $75 ten years ago doesn't seem so bad considering inflation. But OTOH, third, this is now a 12 year old model.... Shouldn't it be cheaper now? Well, it kinda is... the newest models are $150 all the way up to $400. 😳

It took some careful shopping but I did find replacement bits. Amazon helpfully remarked above the product image of a blade replacement "Purchased Aug 2017". The manufacturer suggests replacing blades every 1-2 years, not 4-6. Well, here I am now. And I'm replacing the screen for the first time in 10 years AFAIR. I found a blades-and-screen combo for $47.

I paused for a moment before ordering. On the one hand, $47 seems like a lot of money to spend renewing a 10-year-old, $75 item. OTOH, it's less than one-third the cost of the cheapest new, current generation technology. And it seems quite likely it'll rejuvenate my old shaver well enough that I'll be satisfied with it for at least another few years. I bought it.

Now the only problem is the parts have to ship from England. 😂 They'll take 2 weeks to arrive.

canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
The website Digital Photography Review, aka DPReivew.com, is closing after nearly 25 years on the web. This loss hits me personally as I'm a fan of digital photography, and the site has been my mainstay for news & reviews about digital photography for more than 20 years.

Digital Photography Review, dpreview.com

DPReview was founded in 1999 by Phil Askey. Amazon purchased it in 2007. In January this year Amazon decided to shutter it as part of its workforce realignment. The news was shared publicly earlier this month.

I discovered DPReview in 2000, not long after Phil Askey created it. Back then digital photography was just entering the mainstream. I'd had access to digital imaging equipment for several years before that— first as a grad student researcher in digital imaging and then as an engineer at computer hardware companies. Our lab equipment wasn't consumer grade. It definitely wasn't consumer price. In the year 2000 that started to change: digital cameras entered the realm of consumer affordability. And what you could buy for, say, $800, could produce compelling images as opposed to just being a nifty (but pricey) toy.

🎵 Catch a Wave and You're Sitting on Top of the World 🏄‍♂️ 🎵

I was part of that early wave of consumers who said, "I want to buy a digital camera!" The question was, which one? The industry was moving so fast that traditional media struggled to keep up. In its place appeared a slew of digital photography websites created by Internet-savvy enthusiasts. I remember having 4 or 5 of them bookmarked and checking them all at least once a week. Among them, DPReview pulled out to an early lead. Founder Phil Askey was earnest about staying on top of things and improving his own skill as a critical reviewer. In addition, his inclusion of discussion forums on the site made it a real standout versus the rest that were strictly one-way publishing sites.

What's the point of all that? It's two points, actually. One, DPReview was in the right place at the right time— there for the meteoric rise of digital photography. Two, Askey, the site's founder, made choices early on that distinguished his site in a crowded field. His site grew bigger and bigger, which attracted more ad revenue, which allowed him to hire staff to help the site grow even bigger, etc. Take the fact that Amazon bought him out— and kept DPReview running basically as what it was— as the mark of his success.

What Fills the Void?

I remarked above that the closure of DPReview is a personal loss. It's not just a matter of nostalgia. Twenty-three years DPReview remains my primary source of information about photography. In that time I've purchased 7 generations of digital cameras. All were with extensive research on that website. I've been researching my next purchase, too. It might be later this year. But now I'll have to figure out where else to go for information that is as comprehensive, as up-to-date, and as professional.

RIP, DPReview.



canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
It's about 5pm and I've gotten back to my hotel. I checked out this morning but left my suitcase with the bell desk so I wouldn't have to lug it through the conference. Yeah, I could have gone straight to the airport from the show if I'd taken it, instead of trudging on foot almost a mile back to my hotel, but the waits for taxis, Lyft, and Uber from the conference hotel are crazy. It's actually somewhat quiet back here at the Resorts World... but only somewhat, as people are streaming in for National Finals Rodeo (NFR), one of the biggest events of the year in Vegas.

I worked the show all day today, 10am-4pm. I actually arrived at the booth at 9:45 when almost nobody else was there. The few who were noticed that I was early, though, and thanked me. One of my teammates didn't even show up at all today. Trade show discipline has sadly never been a priority at this company. Though maybe that's changing now with new people in the marketing events team. ...Until they all turn over again in 6 months, then who knows what comes next. 🙄

I dressed up as the Jenkins the Butler again today, after lunch. I'd done it earlier this week on Monday evening. Overall recognition of the character was poor. It's not quite the best demographic here at this show. I got a colleague to join me on making a round through several other vendors' booths this afternoon. The idea was we'd have some fun and stir up some trouble. ...Trouble by challenging competitors with a living mascot, that is. Sadly the competitors' booths didn't have many technical people in them, so few people were aware of the prank we were playing.

I did score an interview with a roving AWS re:Invent TV crew. I told them I'd just come back from the Rap Battle booth, and spat fire on a few verses live for them. The interview loved it and did a mic drop for me on camera.

I'll post more about the Jenkins cosplay soon.



canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Today was the first day of the AWS re:Invent trade show. Ugh. It was only 3 hours for the exhibit floor, but our booth was wrecked. We had a line of people 20 deep most of the evening. That would seem to be a good thing, right? No, it wasn't. 9/10 of those people didn't know and didn't care what our company does; they were only there for the free giveaways. The other 1/10 weren't great leads, either, as most insisted they were in no position to choose or even influence software purchases. Oh, and the whole show floor was jammed. People everywhere. All looking for free food and free t-shirts and toys. Only 3 more days of this! 😖
canyonwalker: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles. Travel! (planes trains and automobiles)
True to plan, I'm back at the airport 16 hours after getting home last night. As crazy as this fast turnaround seems it's not too bad. I planned ahead before my previous trip so that I could dump my suitcase from the first trip and repack quickly for the next. That plan was in case the turn was even tighter, e.g. if my Sunday night flight was late or something else went wrong. Instead nothing went wrong (yay?) so I had more time than planned. I used that time to wash and dry laundry last night and catch up on work email/Slack this morning.

So, here I am at the airport. It actually seems busier today, judging by lines at check-in and security, than at the same time yesterday— and yesterday was reportedly the busiest travel day since 2019!

This trip I'm headed to Las Vegas for work. The AWS re:Invent trade show is this week. I'm working my company's booth. That means over the next 3.5 days I'll talk to about 500 people about what my company's products do. Five of those 500 will actually care; the other 495 will just want a free t-shirt.

How's it going so far? It's not trending well. I'm not even to Vegas yet and already my flight's delayed.


canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Amazon announced last Friday the cost of Amazon Prime is going up. Annual subscriptions increase by $20, to $139/year. Monthly subscriptions increase by $2/month, to $14.99. Ah, inflation!1

In the news coverage about this price increase I saw one clickbait-y headline about "How people can save $100s or even $1000s with this Prime change!" I was curious if the article would reveal some not-widely-known or new benefit of Prime membership, or— more likely— would be a snarky way of saying, "Shop elsewhere." ...It was a snarky way of saying, "Shop elsewhere."

Coincidentally I had just seen this effect myself a week or two earlier: Amazon, long known for being the cheaper alternative to traditional retailers, is not always the cheapest anymore!

In the situation 2 weeks ago I was shopping for some OTC health supplies. Only one vendor on Amazon offered what I needed— which itself was weird, because there used to be several— and they stated delivery would take 4-5 weeks. So much for free 2-day delivery with Prime, huh? 🙄 I decided to check at Walmart.com and not only found the same item available with delivery promised in just a few days but also priced 10% cheaper!

Subsequently I've found other items, including haircare products and household items, on better deals at Walmart.com. Not only are they 10-20% cheaper at Walmart.com but they're in stock when Amazon's sellers are saying it will take weeks for delivery. Amazon used to be the only place I'd check for online shopping for a wide variety of things. Not anymore.


1. It's actually not inflation, per se, but rather Amazon's need to show growth to its investors. Subscriber numbers are flattening out, so to show revenue growth Amazon— like a bunch of other big-name online companies recently— is increasing membership price.


Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 06:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios