canyonwalker: Breaking Bad stylized logo showing Walter White (breaking bad)
One little bit that may have gone ignored in a previous episode of Breaking Bad, S1E4, was where DEA agent Hank remarked to his team that drug dealer Crazy-8, who was missing and presumed dead at that point, had been a confidential informant. And in exchange for Crazy-8 ratting on other drug dealers, the DEA was letting Crazy-8 continue being a gang boss himself. Even worse, Hank acknowledged that every time they arrested another drug dealer whom Crazy-8 ratted out to them, Crazy-8 absorbed that other drug dealer's territory. This is a problem from a law enforcement perspective because it means the police aren't actually reducing crime, they're just rearranging who's committing the crimes. Moreover, they're choosing who's allowed to commit the crimes— and they're helping promote a chosen small-time drug dealer into a big-time gangster.

The issue came up again in S2E2 when Hank and his DEA partner were briefing the local police on drug dealer Tuco. Hank compared Tuco's criminal enterprise to Crazy-8's and mentioned it he was glad Crazy-8 had been "eliminated". The local police didn't know the DEA was purposefully ignoring— perhaps even protecting— Crazy-8's crimes.

Look, I get it that policing against crime gangs means working with bad people. Cops have to get evidence and leads from people who themselves are criminals who are cooperating. And prosecutors have to get cooperating witnesses to get eye-witness and other evidence. In both cases "cooperating" generally means overlooking or under-prosecuting crimes. This is an unfortunate reality that must be accepted. But it is also a moral hazard that must be examined. Does overlooking crime A to prosecute crime B genuinely serve the public interest?

A lot of police-procedural shows show this kind of deal-making. Most even tackle the issue of Does overlooking crime A to prosecute crime B genuinely serve the public interest? directly. For example, when the plot has a DA offering leniency to a person who committed a murder in exchange for testimony to convict their boss who ordered multiple murders, we see the DA and their colleagues weighing this arrangement on the scales of justice. It's a grisly calculus, but at least it computes: go lightly on one murder to convict on multiple others.

In the situation in Breaking Bad with Crazy-8 I would argue the answer was No. Just as many drugs were being supplied as before, all that was being changed was who's the supplier. Worse, the DEA was creating a public perception of success in the War on Drugs to justifying its budget and police powers without actually making the public any safer.
canyonwalker: Breaking Bad stylized logo showing Walter White (breaking bad)
In Season 2 of Breaking Bad Walt decides it's time to scale up the drug making operation. There's a supply chain problem with going big, though. Jesse has been sourcing pseudephedrine pills, an over-the-counter cold medicine that can be crushed up and used as of the key precursors to making methamphetamine, by sending a network of buyers out to drugstores to buy boxes. He can manage that at small scale but not 5x or 10x the quantity because in 2008, when the show was filmed, there were already laws limiting the sale of pseudephedrine— because of exactly the criminal drug-making this show is about.

Pseudephedrine is a common medication that is sold under the brand name Sudafed and plenty of generics. Except it's not so common anymore. Long ago I could just pop into a CVS when I was feeling sick, but a few bottles of different pills, and get relief. A 2006 federal law required stores to limit purchases and check ID. I remember blogging years ago that I had to show more ID to buy cough syrup than I had to show to vote. And in that case, the thing I was buying didn't even contain pseudephedrine. The government's clamp-down was so tough that retailers acted out of fear and limited not just pseudephedrine but anything that seemed even vaguely similar to it.

Today I can still buy pseudephedrine, by going to the pharmacist who keeps it locked behind the counter. I still have to show ID, which is recorded, and I'm still limited in how much I can purchase at a time. But the stores don't always stock it. This is one of the other consequences of strict limits: it gets basically taxed out of existence. Make it hard to get, and people will give up trying to get it. When people stop trying to buy it, even for legit uses, stores stop stocking it regularly. Why carry something for which there's little demand?

Meanwhile the pharmacy and pharmaceutical industries shifted to foist a stupid placebo on us. They replaced pseudephedrine with phenylephrine— a drug that was proven not to work. Thanks, meth makers, you made it harder to for the rest of us to treat our colds and allergies. And thanks, War on Drugs, Big Pharma, and Weak-Kneed FDA. 👎


canyonwalker: Breaking Bad stylized logo showing Walter White (breaking bad)
This evening I watched episode 7 of Breaking Bad,  the end of season 1. One point the story has been making throughout much of the season is the hypocrisy of the War on Drugs. Yes, drug dealers are bad people. They're violent. And they're peddling dangerous products. But they exist because people want those products. Lots of people want those products.

In S1E3 Hank, Walt's brother-in-law and a DEA agent, drives Walt Jr. to a skeezy motel where he knows lots of meth addicts hang out. He is there to scare Walt Jr. out of using the "gateway" drug, marijuana. Except Walt Jr. is not using marijuana. And it's not really a gateway drug, anyway. Not any more than alcohol or nicotine are. As Hank is asking Walt Jr. rhetorical questions about what a gateway drug is and why it's a gateway drug, I jokingly answered "Alcohol!" every time Hank paused being filling in the word "Marijuana". And every single time, it fit.

In S1E5 Walt Jr. gets busted by a cop... for asking him to buy beer for him and 2-3 of his friends, all underage. Yup, literally a gateway drug right there. Alcohol. Walt Jr. is let off with a stern warning when Hank shows up to vouch for him.

In S1E4 Jesse shows up at his parents' house while high on drugs. His parents take him in but fret over how to set boundaries with him. They love him but do not approve of his drug use. We meet Jesse's much younger brother, Jake. Jake is 10 and is like everything that Jesse is/was not. He's intellectual, he's well spoken, he's an excellent student, he studies music. His parents love him. A day or two the parents' housekeeper finds a joint in the bedroom. She takes it to Mr. and Mrs. Pinkman. They confront Jesse and throw him out of the house. In the next scene, when Jake says goodbye to Jesse as he's getting into a taxi, Jake thanks Jesse for not telling them the joint was his. A 10 year old boy is a pot head. But he's still an excellent student. And his parents don't even know. Edited to add: Jake's joint did not come from Jesse.

In S1E6 Hank and his DEA team arrest Hugo, a janitor at the school where Walt teaches. Hank has traced the respirator mask found near a crime scene in the desert to missing inventory from the school's chemistry lab. Indeed, Walt stole those items. But Hank arrested the janitor on suspicion of the theft because he had a history of minor drug convictions. Then they searched his car and found a joint. They never did find any evidence linking Hugo to the thefts or any crimes related to methamphetamine manufacture, drug dealing, kidnapping, or murder; but just the drug convictions far in Hugo's past were enough to get the DEA to arrest him in front of the whole school and destroy his career.

In S1E7 Hank pulls out a few Cuban cigars to share with Walt outside at the baby shower for his daughter. Walt points out, accurately, that Cuban cigars are illegal in the U.S. Hank, the DEA agent, shrugs it off and completely fails to see the irony that he, a drug enforcement officer, is possessing and distributing contraband. "It's all arbitrary" what's illegal and what's not, Walt argues. Hank is completely unable to see that, too.

I'm not saying right now that any specific drug should be legal or illegal. That's a whole 'nother issue. What I'm calling attention to right now is that the status quo is pretty arbitrary. We need to recognize that first in order to move forward in making it make more sense.


canyonwalker: Breaking Bad stylized logo showing Walter White (breaking bad)
This weekend I started watching the streaming series Breaking Bad. Yes, I'm late to the party. This show originally aired between 2008-2013. It's on Netflix, which we just started a subscription to thanks to a discounted bundle offer with our Verizon mobile phone service.

Breaking Bad, 2008-2013

Breaking Bad tells the (fictional) story of Walter White, a high school chemistry teacher in suburban Albuquerque, New Mexico, who suddenly is diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer. Already struggling to make ends meet to support his family, White becomes curious about manufacturing illegal drugs, specifically methamphetamine, to afford treatment and to leave money for his family to survive after he dies.

Walter White specifically starts as sort of a sad sack of a middle-aged man. His wife doesn't really listen to him, their son has a handicap requiring special care, none of his students seem to care about learning and some of them are openly disrespectful. His wife, now pregnant, doesn't work, and he's had to take on a second job at a car wash to support his family. At the car wash he's hired to be the cashier, but the owner sends him outside to polish tires every time there's a no-show on the shift.

Show creator Vince Gilligan has quipped that the character arc he planned to show is the change in Walter White from "Mister Chips" to "Scarface". Lead actor Bryan Cranston certainly starts out portraying the sad-sack White fairly well. He's so mild he's cringe. But how well will he portray the transformation? With the show's shelf full of creative awards I presume it's done well. Now after years of waiting I'll get to watch it episode by episode.

canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
Los Cabos Travelog #7
Downtown Los Cabos - Sun, 5 May 2024, 12pm

Today we're out and about in Cabo San Lucas, wandering the streets and shops in the city center. Yesterday we were here late in the afternoon on a day when there was a cruise ship in port, so all the merchants seemed tired out. This morning things are a lot quieter, and the merchants are fresh-eyed. Oh, and today drug dealers are out. Every second person we pass on the streets is a tout who asks me if I want to buy weed.

I thought marijuana was illegal in Mexico— and heavily punished, compared to the increasingly liberal laws in many parts of the US. Well, a quick search shows that weed is now legal here, albeit only in small quantities. I don't know if the dealers on the street are legit sellers offering legit quantities. The fact that they're all men dressed in ordinary clothes and whispering their offers as they pass strongly suggests to me it's not on the up-and-up.

Another form of drugs that's surprisingly legal here in Mexico are prescription drugs— or drugs that, in the US, are only available with a script. But here all kinds of pain killers, even opiates more powerful than Oxycontin, are sold at streetfront pharmacies. And pharmacies are everywhere. Here in the downtown core there's literally at least one on every block. The implication that there's a huge tourist drug trade— the hotel concierge even encouraged us to visit the town's many pharmacies as tourists— is alarming.

Many drugs tightly controlled in the US are sold without restriction in Mexico (May 2024)

But when in Rome... right? I bought a small bottle of Flexeril pills. It's a muscle relaxant I've used before (with a prescription) when I've had a pinched nerve. The nerve pain I've had in my elbow for a few weeks now has getting worse. I figure instead of gobbling ibuprofen and acetaminophen on this trip I'll take something stronger that I know works for this kind of pain.

Oh, and speaking of gobbling things, we just ate lunch. Instead of another very-bougie $133 lunch at the hotel cafe we stopped a street cafe a few blocks from the marina.

Lunch at a local cafe in Cabo San Lucas (May 2024)

What attracted us here was the overall casual vibe, the al fresco dining, and a menu that skewed toward inexpensive a la carte items. We got a few tacos (one arrachera and one al pastor), a dish of guacamole, and a basket of fries. Oh, and a beer and a glass of piña. All this set us back barely more than $20. Not only was that price less than one-sixth yesterday's lunch, the food was way more flavorful, too!

canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
There's been good news and bad news on the Being-Sick-Sucks front. The bad news is that last night was a rough night. To cap off a pretty much shitty all the way through, three day weekend last night I was 🤌🏻 this close to asking Hawk to drive me to the ER. My hacking cough was so bad I was often struggling to breathe. With the help of a medicine cabinet full of OTC pills I was able to keep it in check just well enough to settle down to sleep.

The good news has two parts. First, this morning I woke up feeling a lot better. Part of it, I'm sure, was holdover from all the pills I gobbled last night. But it's also plausible that after three tough days I'm on the mend. The other good news is that I visited the doctor this morning and... got MOAR pills!

Ugh. Too Many Pills.

Yay. More pills. As if I wasn't already taking enough. 🙄 But the news drugs are exactly what I was looking for: a prescription cough suppressant and an asthma inhaler (because there's a bronchitis aspect to my coughing— which I sensed and the doc agreed after listening with a stethoscope).

Now that I'm hopped up on more pills than last time I hope this illness doesn't run two weeks like last time.

canyonwalker: My other car is a pair of hiking boots (in beauty I walk)
Australia Travelog #27
Valley of the Waters, NSW - Fri, 29 Dec 2023, 10:30am

The first part of our hike down into Valley of the Waters was not exactly fun. The sky was gray, casting a pall over everything. And there was lots of descent— which not only ached my injured ankle going down but made me dread the pain I'd endure climbing back up. That cast a further pall over things.

The pall of pain I couldn't do much about except grit my teeth in determination. There is no "back", only forward.

As for the pall of the gray sky... well, that's actually good for visiting waterfalls. The dimmer sky creates a more intimate atmosphere down underneath the tree canopy. Moisture on the leaves from fog or light rain makes everything glisten. And the dimmer, more even light from the overcast sky makes waterfall photography more vibrant. ...That sounds paradoxical; dimmer equals more vibrant? It's because, technically, the dimmer light makes it easier to capture the the contrast of the scene with a camera's limited range of brightness sensitivity.

Now about those waterfalls....

Empress Falls in Valley of the Waters, NSW, Australia (Dec 2023)

Empress Falls (above) was the nominal star of the trip. She's the tallest on today's trek, with the upper set of cascades being about 80' tall. I thought this lower vantage point, showing the wider, shorter lower tier made for better composition. Update: I'll come back to the upper part in my next blog.

Below Empress Falls the trail kept going down, down, down. I wasn't sure how well I could make it back up but... in for a penny, in for a pound, as they say. Or, there is no "back", only forward.

Sylvia Falls in Valley of the Waters, NSW, Australia (Dec 2023)

I was glad I kept going forward, as Sylvia Falls is quite beautiful. At less than half the height of Empress Falls I found it more enchanting, partly because it's right there next to you. And the gentler flow of water makes it even more intimate.

Trail reports had warned us that the trail is blocked below Sylvia Falls by a landslide. We didn't see any signs of closure of danger, though, so we continued forward.

Sitting by an unnamed falls in Valley of the Waters, NSW, Australia (Dec 2023)

We found one more falls (above) before the trail was blocked. This falls was much smaller than the others but even more intimate. Intimate, as in you could sit right next to it.

We weren't the only ones here. A family had arrived just ahead of us. An adolescent girl posed for pictures in the water (we waited for her to finish) while her older brother snapped lots of pictures with his DSLR camera.

Keeping Australia's Kids Off Drugs

I noticed the boy balancing his camera on his dad's shoulder. "I see you've got an impromptu tripod there," I ventured. "Are you using with a neutral density filter to take slow-exposure pics?"

"Nah, I need to buy one of those next," he answered.

"What filter size does your lens take?" I asked, seeing already that it was likely the same as mine. Once we confirmed it was the same size, I offered him my 6-stop ND filter (some technical discussion in this blog and another blog it links to) to try shooting some silky water pics. He enjoyed capturing several frames and then passed the filter back to me. Well, if he got some Amazon gift certificates for Christmas, I know one thing he might want to buy now. 😅 There's an old saying, "If you want to keep your kids away from drugs, get them interested in photography. Then they'll never have money left for drugs!" 🤣

Update: On the way back up we saw an amazing sight— climbers rappelling down the face of Empress Falls!


canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
President Biden on Thursday pardoned all prior federal offenses of simple marijuana possession. It's widely seen as a first step toward decriminalization of marijuana. Example news coverage: CNN.com article, 6 Oct 2022.

"Wow, this must affect a lot of people," I thought at first. I've been hearing from marijuana legalization advocates for decades that some 90% of all people in federal prison are there on nonviolent drug convictions. So I skimmed through news articles such as the one linked above to find how many people would be freed, and it's... zero. "Officials said there are currently no Americans serving prison time solely on federal simple marijuana possession charges," the article reports. The government estimates, though, that there are 6,500 people convicted of such crimes in the past.

So where are all these nonviolent simple drug possession offenders, this supposed 90% of all convicts, being imprisoned? They're not in state prisons. Ten years ago I asked a brother-in-law of mine who's a state prosecutor about the 90% statistic. He just laughed. "If that were true, given the short sentences that crime carries, marijuana possession would be 98% of my office's cases. It's more like zero. Maybe that 90% is the feds."

Well, the numbers from drug legalization advocates are clearly hokum. (Is anyone really surprised?) But that doesn't mean Biden's pardon is wrong. I'm in favor of correcting government drug policy to be rational and evidence based. Marijuana was miscategorized by the federal government decades ago, contrary to available facts and for openly racist reasons. Biden is working on changing that, too. He says he will instruct the HHS and Attorney General to review the facts and set new policy as appropriate. We'll see how long that takes.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
I've seen a few articles in my newsfeed today that cigarette smoking is down and marijuana use is up in the US... so much so that the latter now outnumbers the former. Rather than cite the articles here I figured I'd go the the source. The source is a Gallup publication, "Americans and the Future of Cigarettes, Marijuana, Alcohol" published 26 Aug 2022 from a poll conducted in July. I read that study and the more detailed breakouts it links to. (Yes, I just cited primary source documents to support my opinion online. That's how I roll!)

One Gallup survey question was, "Have you, yourself, smoked any cigarettes in the past week?" A record low of 11% answered yes. That's a big drop from 16% a year earlier and rates of 40%+ five decades ago.

Some news articles reporting this Gallup release cross reference it with another recent publication, "Global Smoking Report" from NiceRx, to show how smoking rates vary by state within the US. (It's not a primary source, per se, but it does disclose its methods and sources— which include the World Health Organization and Our World In Data.) This report finds that, globally, the smoking rate is 22.3%. Within the US it breaks down smoking rates by state. The smokiest state is West Virginia, with a smoking rate of nearly 24%. Kentucky is only a hair behind at #2. The least smoky state is Utah, at 7.9%. Gotta love the Mormon faith that abjures alcohol, tobacco, and even caffeine! The second least smoky state is California, with a smoker rate of 10%.

Back to the Gallup poll and the headline about pot use overtaking cigs. While cigarette smoking has dropped to 11%, the same survey found that 16% have used marijuana recently. And that's despite marijuana being not only illegal at the federal level but also classified as a Schedule I drug— nominally the most dangerous and addictive drugs, with a "high potential for abuse". 🙄 I'm not a marijuana advocate, but there's no medical evidence pot belongs in the same category as heroin. I mean, even fentanyl, about which there's been much wailing and gnashing of teeth the past several years for its highly addictive nature and mortal danger, is only a Schedule II drug (primary source document again).

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 01:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios