canyonwalker: WTF? (wtf?)
I saw an interesting article in my newsfeed yesterday, "Gen Z Doesn't Know How to Act in Bars." I'm always curious to read the latest in how older generations are scorning the young. And this article was published by Vox, which has a strong reputation for insightful explanatory journalism. Perhaps this article would go beyond superficial scoffing, I thought, and show whether there's really a there there. Well, it did, and it didn't.

First, let me summarize the complaints, according to the article, about how Gen Z acts incorrectly in bars:

  • Gen Z closes out their bills each round, instead of leaving a tab open for the evening, making more work for the bartender. Yes, this really is the primary complaint; the article even states that explicitly. ...Which makes me wonder who wrote this, an overworked bartender?

  • In a group of Gen Zs, not everybody will order a drink. ...Again, what sources were used for writing this article?

  • Gen Z groups are more interested in socializing with the friends they came with than chatting up the bartender. ...Seriously?

  • Gen Z groups stay a long time without drinking the whole time. ...Are you sensing a pattern here?

The author shows a moment of self-awareness about the rubbish she's spreading. Before presenting the above complaints she writes:

"Obviously, it’s incredibly satisfying to point out how a person — or, even better, a whole group of people — does something wrong. It’s even more fulfilling to be able to signal a divide, a marker that, for objective scientific reasons, you could never be implicated in this type of chaotic discordance. Look at this worse person — who is nothing like me — move through the universe, incorrectly!"
You could plausibly argue that this foreward to the complaints— which, taken together, all sound like they come from impatient bartenders who wish customers would just pay and get out— invites us to scoff at them and dismiss them. Indeed, for some of us, like me, it does. I love her little passage about thinking ourselves better than others. But in a published work I believe you've got to evaluate the content by its mass. When an essay is 98% complaints and 2% one trenchant little paragraph about how, maybe, the complaints aren't valid, most people— maybe even, say, 98%— are going to take away the 98% as the message.

What's wrong with the complaints in the article, by the way? Here are Five Things. And remember, I'm two generations older than Gen Z.

1. Closing out the bill each round sounds like a store problem, not a customer problem. Seriously, easy and fast payment system exist. Stop being cheapskates and replace your early-2000s technology. Don't tell me you can't afford to upgrade when you sell $1.50 bottles of beer for $10+ each.

2. Yeah, not everybody orders a drink. Deal with it. It was like that 25-30 years ago when I was a regular bar patron, too.

3. Is it because your service sucks? One big reason not everybody among my friends 25-30 years ago ordered drinks was shit service. At a pub I met friends at every week, most stopped ordering food and drink because table service became so erratic. That was one particular establishment, but in general service levels are way weaker today than they were back in the late 1990s.

4. People order fewer drinks because they're expensive. Even as a Gen Xer I order way fewer drinks in bars and food-and-bar establishments now than in the past because they've just so darn expensive. At $10+ for a beer and $15+ for a cocktail I just can't enjoy them much anymore. Plus, if had the weaker finances of a 20-something I certainly wouldn't be downing a lot of $15+ mixed drinks!

5. People linger over drinks. That's how bars have always worked. The thing that's most ridiculous about this article is the bartenders' repeated preference that people just order drinks as long as they're there, then leave. And that's just so many kinds of wrong. To name just two: A, it was never like that. B, do you really expect people to buy a drink and leave— they could buy that $10 beer for $2 at the grocery store if that's all they wanted— or to get soused on multiple rounds of drinks if they stay for a few hours? These bartenders seem like the worst of the doesn't-know-how-to-socialize stereotype typically thrust on Gen Z.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
It's been a few months since the last BuzzFeed listicle mis-categorizing everyone over 40 as "Boomers". It's time for another! Earlier this week I read "If You've Done At Least 15 Of These 35 Things, You're 1000% A Boomer"... which I'll note was titled "...You're 1000% Over 65" (emphasis mine) at the time  I first read it. Like the last of these articles I read it shows that Gen Z— the age group that authors who write these fluffy click-bait articles belong to— thinks that anyone who remembers things that were common up through the 1980s must be a Boomer / senior citizen.

Ahem, we kids who were growing up and doing things in the 1980s are called Gen X. And we're in our 40s/50s. And even many older Millennials remember many of the things on this recent list.

BTW, my score on this list was 20/35. And I'm many years short of being a Boomer. Here are just Five Things from the list of supposed "Boomer" items that virtually all Gen Xers, and most older Millennials, would be familiar with:

1. Have you ever manually cranked a car window up or down?

Manual-crank car windows were common up through the 1980s and into the 1990s. The first car I bought, a new 1991 vehicle, had manual crank windows. Yes, power windows were common by then, too, but in that era economy cars still had manual windows. I recall once getting a rental car in the mid 2000s that still had manual windows. I'll bet most people who are 35+, not just 65+, have cranked a manual window at some point.

3. Have you ever watched television on a TV that had no remote control and just dials?

I recall my parents first got a TV with wireless remote control in about 1985. Prior to that changing the channel— or even adjusting the volume— required walking up to the device and turning a knob. Or pressing a button. Yes, there was a middle ground between turning big, chunky, old-fashioned knobs and modern remote controls. TVs had modern push-button controls on the device for years before buttons on wireless remotes became common.

I used a non-remote TV again in 1992-1993 in college. It was an older TV set one of my housemates got from his parents. It had those chunky, old-fashioned knobs on it... but we rarely used them, because with only one, weak, weeny TV station available via antenna, we left the TV tuned to channel 3 for input from the VCR. Ah, tuning to channel 3 for VCRs and video games. that's another 1980s-ism... that virtually all Gen Xers and older Millennials would remember.

16. Have you ever looked up a phone number in the phone book?

Younger people these days may have trouble imagining a world before everything was online, but it wasn't that long ago. Amazon didn't even open until 1995, and back then it was just a bookstore. It wasn't until the early 2000s that most traditional businesses began to have even a minimal web presence, one where you could at least find their address and store hours. Thus, needing to use a phone book to find phone numbers to call for information— if it wasn't already shown in a yellow pages ad— was a regular thing up through the early 00s.

BTW, I say this as a digital native living in Silicon Valley. Less technical people and those living in less connected areas would've used phone books on the regular for a few more years.

19./20. Have you ever eaten at McDonald's when the food still came in Styrofoam packaging / when smoking was still allowed?

This one's a two-fer. I've grouped these two together because they're both about McDonald's and because they're not subject to any one person's memory. Questions like "When did [Company X] start/stop [doing Y]?" can be answered via simple search. Y'know, by using the web, that thing that people mistakenly believe kids these days excel at because they're online 24/7 while Boomers (and "Boomers") squint their eyes at and act befuddled and call their kids for help?

McDonald's went big with styrofoam containers for sandwiches in the 1980s. They started phasing it out in 1990 due to popular campaigns against non-biodegradable waste. I mention both the stop and start dates here because actual Boomers would remember a time long before styrofoam containers became common. And really it was just a period of <10 years. But yes, we Gen Xers remember that era well, because it's when we were growing up and treasuring those visits to McDonald's with our parents.

As far as smoking in McDonald's, smoking in all restaurants was common up through the 1990s and even into the 21st century. McDonald's banned smoking in restaurants as a corporate policy in 1994 (New York Times article, 1994!) but that only affected company-owned stores. Most stores were franchised. Smoking in restaurants was banned by law in various jurisdictions over the next fifteen years. California banned smoking in restaurants (but not bars) in 1995. New York banned smoking in restaurants in 2003. It wasn't until 2010 that many other states banned smoking in restaurants. Example source: List of smoking bans in the United States (Wikipedia article).

14. Have you ever balanced a checkbook?
Yes, two days ago.


canyonwalker: I see dumb people (i see dumb people)
Earlier this week I read yet-another Buzzfeed listicle/quiz for amusement, "There Is No Way Anyone Has Done More Than 25 Of These Things Unless They're Over 65". It's in the same vein as a similar Buzzfeed listicle I read (and wrote about) a few months ago. I suggested Buzzfeed retitle that article as It's Official, Gen Z Thinks Anyone Over 40 Is A Boomer.

Remember that the Boomer generation, aka Baby Boomers, are those born from 1946-1964. The youngest Boomers are turning 60 this year. Yet most people over 40— meaning not just Gen Xers like me, but also older Millennials— have probably done many of the things on the list. I'm years younger than the youngest Boomers and I've done 36 out of the 50, including all 20 of the top 20. Here's my hot take on several of them:

1. Adjusted rabbit ears on a television
I did that into the mid 1990s. My parents and adult relatives pretty much all had cable, but as a college student and grad student, my apartment mates and I didn't want to spend for cable TV. Boomers would remember when cable was $10/mo. We younger generations saw it spiral upwards of $100/mo and had to make decisions.

2. Played Pong in an arcade or at home
Okay, this is more of a late 70s/early 80s thing vs. "common into the 1990s". But I'm pretty sure a large number of Gen Xers get this one. I remember seeing a Pong game in my local Pizza Hut as a kid. But I never played because $0.25 was too spendy for my Boomer/Silent Generation parents.

3. Played pinball in an arcade
Mid 1990s, again. All Gen Xers and older Millennials have probably played pinball. Also, arcades didn't really become a thing until Gen X were adolescents.

4. Video stores with walled-off Adult sections
Video stores were at their peak all the way to 2004. I'm sure literally every Gen Xer and most Millennials remember cruising the aisles at video stores, looking for what to rent. As for the specific trope, though, of a walled-off Adult section.... The last one of those I saw personally was in 1996, but that's because that's the last time I had a membership at a locally owned video rental store instead of a national chain. The national chains deemed X-rated material off-brand and didn't offer it.

5. Kept phone numbers in an address book
Late 1990s. That's when cell phones became common for the average adult to own. Once again, all Gen X and older Millennials.

7. Used/seen a working cigarette vending machine
I recall these being commonplace until the early 1980s, present in every supermarket and drug store, so likely most Gen Xers have seen them. Even after that they were still around, though they disappeared from places like supermarkets and would be found in restaurants and bars into the 21st century.

8. Shopped at a five-and-dime
Dude, inflation. Yesterday's five-and-dime morphed into Dollar stores. ...Where, today, almost everything is more than $1.

13. Done a duck-and-cover drill at school in case of nuclear attack
This is one I actually never did. Dunno if that's because "Hide under your desk because bombs don't affect desks" was phased out by the time I began school, or if it's just that the schools/districts I attended had opted out. OTOH, as a Gen Xer, I was fortunately done with school by the time lockdowns and active shooter drills became a thing.

21. Have you ever balanced a checkbook?
I still do. Does your mom buy your food and clothes?


canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
Recently it's become a hot topic on social media whether buying a "$7 coffee" daily/most days of the week is a reasonable treat or a financial failing. This is kind of a repeat of canards like "avocado toast" and "$5 lattes" from past years. Of course now it's a $7 coffee instead of a $5 latte because of inflation.

The basic canard is that young people— and it's almost almost a tongue clucking criticism of younger adults— are destroying their financial futures by wasting their money on frivolous treats such as coffee, lattes, avocado toast, or whatever modern treat old fogies don't understand, when instead they could, and should, be saving that money toward important things like a down payment on buying a house, or retirement.

Although the social media shaming is a modern phenomenon, the underlying question of, "How much should one sacrifice today to save for tomorrow?" is not new. It's a question I asked myself long ago when I was starting out as an adult, years before there was social media and things like maligning avocado toast became memes.

Back then a common way to frame the question was around what to eat for lunch. Do you bring a bag lunch of a cheap sandwich, or do you go out to eat for lunch? A PB&J sandwich was the proxy for wisely saving for later; eating lunch out, even fast food, was the proxy for wastefully spending money today.

I made my own decision long ago that both halves of the question were simultaneously right and wrong. Yes, saving money for the future is right. But enjoying the present is right, too. And reducing the two to a dilemma— where only one is possible— is wrong. I would save some of my money to have nice things in the future while not forcing myself to live an overly austere life in the present. I would eat fast food lunches instead of brown-bagging PB&J sandwiches, because that brought me satisfaction in the present, and I would save for my own future. It was like I would have my cake and eat it, too.

So far it's worked for me.

canyonwalker: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles. Travel! (planes trains and automobiles)
When I drove out to Roseville Wednesday evening ahead of a customer visit Thursday morning I stayed at a Home2 Suites hotel. Home2 Suites is one of the many brands in the Hilton Hotels portfolio. (How many? Hilton currently has 18 distinct brands.) Although Hilton is one of the collections of brands I always check when I'm planning a trip, this is only my second stay at a Home2 Suites ever... and my first stay was over 6 years ago.

Why so few stays? Well, that one stay years ago kind of turned me off the brand. I felt they were cheaping out compared to other budget-business traveler brands, and their style of marketing to Millennials rubbed me the wrong way.

Typical room at Hilton's Home2 Suites (Sep 2023)

This stay reminded me that there's not anything fundamentally wrong with Home2 Suites. Maybe their materials seemed cheap 6 years ago, but nowadays they seem in line with most other mid-range hotels. And their rooms are more spacious than most. The photo above shows a room with a king bed, a bureau, a sofa, and a generously wide desk. Oh, and there's a kitchenette!

Kitchenette at Hilton's Home2 Suites (Sep 2023)

This kitchenette is actually a plus vs. most other mid-range hotels. It lacks the stove top that Residence Inns have, but the full size fridge and microwave (which Residence Inns and a few others also have) is a big improvement over the dorm-size refrigerators and tiny microwaves common in most other hotels. The full size fridge means that on a longer stay I can stash some mornings eats and evening snacks in the room... and if I take home half a pizza after dining out, there's no worries about fitting that pizza box in the fridge.

Speaking of eats, Home2 Suites' breakfast remains a minus. This is where the brand's Millennials-focused marketing turns me off. They style their breakfast as young and hip and appealing to a younger, hipper clientele. They contrast it with the staid, generic, prepackaged crap that other mid-range hotels have descended to offering. But Home2 Suites' breakfast is just fancy-looking prepackaged crap.

As with most Millennial marketing I hate, Millennials aren't the problem; it's the people writing the ad copy that treats Millennials as chumps that irks me. Well, with that big fridge I had plenty of room to bring my own dang breakfast... which I ate in my spacious room at the desk more than wide enough to spread my two computers out.

canyonwalker: Cheers! (wine tasting)
Hard Seltzer is a new category of alcoholic drink that has emerged over the past several years. It's often associated with Millennials, the age group that have popularized it & to whom it is generally marketed. If you've heard Millennials talking about drink brands like White Claw, Topo Chico, and Truly— those are hard seltzers.

By the way, if you still think "Millennials" is a pejorative for "kids", you need to catch up with the times, Boomer. Millennials are people born between 1981 and 1996. Even youngest Millennials have been old enough to buy drinks legally for 5+ years now, let along the older Millennials who are now in their 40s. That's why the market has been shifting around their preferences for several years.

While I enjoy many kinds of alcohol drinks I've resisted trying hard seltzers. For me it's two things. One, hard seltzers tout lots of strong fruit and/or sour flavors. Those aren't my taste in drinks. Two, I am skeptical of "alternative" malt beverages from awful products that alcohol companies foisted on the public in my formative years— crummy wine coolers and the total commercial flop named Zima. Yes, I tried Zima. Once. In the early '90s. I've been reluctant to try anything like it ever since.

I tried High Noon Pineapple cocktail drink. It tastes... Millennial-ish. (May 2023)Just recently, though, I gave in and tried a hard seltzer. It was High Noon Pineapple Vodka & Soda.

Why'd I do that? Well, I wanted to use one of my coupons for a free drink on my Southwest flight yesterday. A couple years ago they had a really good beer, Fat Tire, but they discontinued it. They even discontinued the one decent beer they used to carry, Leinenkugel's Summer Shandy. After those my usual pick became Gin and Tonic, but now Southwest has discontinued even gin! So I decided to give this pineapple-vodka drink a try.

How did it taste? It tastes like a pineapple soda. It's like 1 part pineapple juice mixed with, say, 2 parts club soda or tonic water. I could imagine this being sold in non-alcoholic form as a refreshing fruit soda. But it's got 4.5% alcohol. Except the vodka it's spiked with is flavorless and almost impossible to detect. Basically the drink is alco-pop.

Would I drink it again? Not really. I mean, I might buy it aboard Southwest again— but that's mostly because their other choices are so weak. I don't care for fruit soda. I especially don't care for a boozy drink that tastes like a fruit soda. If I want something "light, refreshing, and fruit-flavored sweet", I'll drink an actually refreshing non-alcoholic drink. When I drink alcohol I want to appreciate the flavor of the alcohol, not have it completely hidden like someone's roofied my drink.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
"Nobody wants to work anymore." That's become a common refrain in the US, especially from people on the political right. It's a catch-all complaint to denote any of an umbrella of socio-political grievances from one's dislike of minimum wage laws, to snide beliefs about public assistance benefits and who uses them, disregard for satisfactory working conditions, frustration with the competitive hiring market, to the presumed notion that younger adults today have no work ethic. But is it a real thing, or just a political canard?

The underlying reality is definitely real: businesses in many sectors are having trouble hiring. I see that in the software/IT industry where I work, where hiring qualified new staff in some disciplines can take months. I also see it in service industry jobs, where workplaces like restaurants are reducing their hours of operation or level of service because they don't have enough staff. For example, I visited a fast food restaurant at lunch today where the cash registers were closed and all customers were directed to order their food from a digital kiosk instead. But is the reason for this labor shortage that "nobody wants to work anymore"... or is it something else?

Five Things:

  • Working is fundamentally an economic transaction: employees provide their labor in exchange for pay. If the pay's not good enough, employees won't work there. It's not that they're unwilling to work. They're unwilling to work for poor pay. They'll work somewhere else.

  • Especially in a market where wages are going up— and they've been rising noticeably for, like, 2 years now; just look at the news— employers need to adjust their expectations of what they need to pay to attract workers. Plus, with inflation rising over the past 14+ months (again, just look at the news) the approximately 40% of workers who live paycheck-to-paycheck have stronger incentive to quit underpaying jobs and work for better wages elsewhere.

  • The coronavirus pandemic of the last few years created a new form of hazardous working condition: the general public. Workers realized jobs that require working closely, face-to-face with the general public, especially unmasked, are riskier. Pay for such jobs needs to be increased to compensate for the higher risk.

  • In a competitive labor market workers consider more than just a job's compensation in determining where to work. The work environment becomes an important consideration more take into account. Managers/owners who are always carping, "Nobody wants to work anymore," are not pleasant to work for. Nobody wants to work for a jackass boss.

  • Some workers have withdrawn from the labor force because it doesn't pay to work. What do I mean? Childcare sucks in the US. It's unaffordable to many. If you have kids and don't earn enough at a job to pay for their care and have enough left over to pay rent, utilities, groceries, etc., you've got to consider staying home to care for them instead. Update: this challenge got way worse with the pandemic because kids were home way more often due to schools switching to remote instruction and having way less tolerance for kids coming in sick for in-person instruction. Nobody wants to work if it's a money-losing arrangement.

So, back to my original question: is it real, or is it a canard? The underlying fact of businesses having trouble hiring is real, but the notion that it's because "nobody wants to work anymore" is a political canard. It's an excuse that transfers responsibility from intransigent business owners and managers to a made-up ethical shortcoming on the part of workers.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Last night I watched S1E4 of The Book of Boba Fett. The series has developed nicely since its uneven start in S1E1. My concern back then was, "It's not clear why I care about these characters" — the main characters Boba Fett and Fennec Shand. If the previous episode started to make their challenges interesting, more than just a series of fight scenes between evil people, this episode is the one where I started to see them as truly sympathetic protagonists. It's also the episode where the story really comes together.

The flashback storyline reaches the point where Fett and Shand meet. That connects it with the storyline of The Mandalorian, which this series spun off from. The flashbacks also reach nearly the present day, or at least where the "present day" storyline started in S1E1.

One sign of how well the story gels in S1E4 is how I was surprised when it was over. "Wait, that's all?" I asked. "That wasn't even 30 minutes!' It was actually 47 minutes. Clearly I care about these characters, and the plot, now.

Space Millennials, Again!

This episode has another scene with what I dubbed Space Millennials in the previous episode. They're the young people who have stylish body modifications— the space version of tattoos and piercings— and own brightly colored hover mopeds— the galaxy far, far away version of expensive iPhones in conspicuous cases— all despite being apparently unemployed idlers. There's a slight spoiler in how Fett meets this gaggle so I won't go into detail on it except to note that they all seemed to be different people from the pod of Space Millennials Fett hired in S1E3. So it's just more amusing stereotyping on the part of the writers.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Recently we watched episodes 2 and 3 of The Book of Boba Fett. These episodes continue the things that were good about the premiere, particularly the rich visuals and the moody setting, while developing enough of a narrative arc to keep the story interesting. They continue to humanize Boba Fett and introduce new villains and challenges to give the story room to run, though they continue to underuse co-star Ming-Na Wen and in fact seem to deliberately marginalize her with a clunky face shield in several scenes.

The episodes continue the premier's approach of splitting time between two stories: Fett's time with the Tuskens after escaping the sarlacc, and "present day" with Fett and partner Fennec Shand establishing themselves as warlords on Tatooine. Watching both episodes in one sitting was helpful because they tell such related parts of a story. Ep. 2, clocking in at 13 minutes longer than eps. 1 and 3, spends most of its time in flashback, which ep. 3 complete. Likewise, ep. 2 introduces new challenges Fett faces in the present day, and ep. 3 spends more time fleshing them out.

Spice Trade and Space Millennials

In the flashback timeline Fett continues his recovery with a Tusken tribe. Episode 2 spoilers )

In the present-day timeline of eps. 2-3 Fett discovers a new foe, and old foe, and makes new allies. The new foe Episode 3 spoilers )

Oh, right, the Space Millennials!

The "Space Millennials" accompany Boba Fett and Fennec Shand

They're not the villains, though. A local merchant complains to Fett that a gang of youths with cyborg enhancements are stealing his water. Fett and Shand go to investigate and find a small group of conspicuously dressed young people, with brightly colored space-mopeds, hanging out drinking water.

The showrunners telegraph that the water is an extravagance, like the much maligned avocado toast that supposedly prevents Millennials from being able to buy houses. Plus, how is it that they can't afford water but can afford cybernetic implants and brightly colored space-Vespas that look like the oversized iPhones of a galaxy far-far-away? Oh, and they're unemployed despite owning these fancy iMopeds. Total Millennial stereotyping, here.

The young adults have a good side. They're stealing but only from a dishonest merchant who tripled his prices on a necessity of life. Fett offers to pay their debt, at a discount, if they work for him. They agree. And in addition to helping fight off one foe (spoilers above) they help him chase down another foe in episode 3's final scenes.

Fett goes to confront the city's near-useless mayor after learning of his latest attempt to stir up trouble. Episode 3 spoilers ) Yup, don't mess with drug spice dealers! 🤣

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
As I wrote about my youngest sister turning 40 recently I thought about how the 10 year age difference between us made a difference in how we grew up... and how it didn't. At age 40 my sister is technically a Millennial, while I'm squarely in the middle of Gen X. But she's at the cusp of the Millennial generation; people born just 1 year earlier are Gen X. I see in her (and her age peers) a blend of characteristics from both age cohorts.

That got me wondering, as an aside, what do you call people who are part Millennial and part Gen X?  "Xillennial", I figured. I tried searching on that term to see if anyone else is using it. I discovered that the shorter Xennial has already become somewhat common to describe this age group!

Xennials, people born in the late 70s to early 80s, really do straddle some of the cultural divides between generations. My sister matches most of the traits of this subgroup. For example:

— Xennials, like we Gen Xers, grew up using landline phones. They're familiar with hand-written lists of phone numbers on the wall and sharing a phone number with everyone in the household. They may never have "dialed" a phone, though, except at grandma's house. Mobile phones became common around the time they were in college.

— Xennials knew what life was like pre-Internet. Yet the home Internet revolution (which I peg at "later 1990s") happened while they were in high school, so it was also something they grew up with. By the time they were in college digital literacy was considered normal... at least among students. A few writers call Xennials "the AOL generation".

— Xennials, like Gen X, got through school before social media became a dominant force, along with the stresses it puts on adolescents. But social media emerged while they were still generally young enough to embrace it as new technology. One upshot is that Xennials parents, like Millennials, generally are not befuddled by their kids' devices, apps, social media, etc. Even though these things didn't exist when they were kids, Xennials started using social media for themselves before they had kids or while their kids were very young.

Are you a Xennial, or do you have close friends/relatives who are? What do you think about these comparisons?

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 3031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 10:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios