canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
At Del's memorial service on Sunday guests were once again invited to share a memory of him. It's a custom in Jewish mourning. Unlike a few days earlier at the house when everyone, all 8 of us, spoke, at the service only a few of us rose to speak. Maybe people felt intimidated by the audience of 30, maybe the fact that our sharing was the last thing standing in the way of dinner had people just wanting to get past it. 😅 Here's the story I shared:

Back in March or April of 2021 I was with Del and D at a custom suit shop in San Francisco. This was a few months before their wedding, their second wedding, with a big Jewish ceremony in New York. They were getting their suits refitted as they'd both lost weight. D had been successful with diet and exercise. Del's weight loss happened for a different reason— cancer. The cancer he beat, at the time. Del was fretting about how well-wishers at the wedding would congratulate him on losing weight and ask how he did it.

"You've got to get ahead of it," I suggested. "Own the topic. Tell them it was cancer and losing weight was, like, the one good thing that came out of it."

"Well, I tried a lot of of methods unsuccessfully," Del vamped with comedic delivery. "None of them worked. But then I got cancer and the pounds just melted away!"

I share this moment not to make light of a dark subject but to recall how, even at times of darkness, Del found and shared the bit of light within it.


canyonwalker: I see dumb people (i see dumb people)
There's an old joke that people make. "I don't drink 2% milk," they say, trying to make themselves sound smart, "Because what's the other 98%?"

Yeah, that's amusing if you're a stand-up comic and your audience hasn't heard it before, let alone dozens of times before. But what if it's a real question? Well, as a real question it has a real answer... and that answer isn't even hard to find. A few seconds on Google turns up numerous resources, including this Wikipedia article, Fat Content of Milk.

"Whole milk" in the US and a few other countries has 3.25% butterfat by weight. So 2% milk still has 61.5% the fat of whole milk. And it's not "98% what" because it isn't adulterated by adding some mystery ingredient. The milk is spun in a centrifuge to remove some of the fat content, leaving simply... less fatty milk.

Merely Asking Questions is not Intelligence

Some people proclaim themselves smart because they ask questions. I see that a lot in politics. Merely asking questions, though, does not denote intelligence. The mark of intelligence is a person who goes through a 4 step process: (1) Recognizing there is something one doesn't know. (2) Asking a question. (3) Seeking an answer from reputable sources. (4) Incorporating the new knowledge into one's understanding of things, including revising or even discarding previous beliefs where the new information contradicts them.

Some people do none of these yet consider themselves intelligent. Many do 1-2 and stop there. Few do all 4. It takes all 4 to be intelligent.

canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
Hawk startled me awake when I had just fallen asleep a few nights ago. "Come look at the sheep!" she exclaimed.

I grumbled. I didn't want to get out of bed. But she insisted.

I went out to landing at the top of the stairs where Hawk was shining a UV light on three of our stuffed animals. She bought the UV light a few months ago. It's an interesting tool/toy for examining the many semi-precious stones she collects. Certain minerals glow or reflect different colors in the UV light. That night she shined it on a bunch of our stuffed animals, and...

Oh, great. The sheep are evil. (UV light, Jul 2023)

"Oh, great," I said. "The sheep are evil."

Their eyes all glow in UV light. One has a red mouth. Another has glowing red horns. Evil!

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
It's a few days late, but since I'm such a science fiction fan I figured I'd jump on the bandwagon of wishing everyone a happy May 4th.

May The Fourth Be With You!

Confused? )
canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
Have you ever played the game of responding to news headlines that pose a question by suggesting the simple, brief answer that could make up the whole article? I've been doing that with headlines about the coronation of Charles III, King of England.

For example, one headline in an American news source the other day was:

Everything You Need to Know About Charles III's Coronation

...And I'm like, ooh, that's easy:

  1. The coronation is Saturday, 5 May 2023.

  2. Your American forebears declared independence from this antiquated monarchy nearly 250 years ago.

  3. Stop being an idiot.


Then I saw the headline:

How to Watch the Coronation in America

...And I'm like, wow, that's even easier:

  1. Don't.

🤣

UPDATE: Now that it's over, here's the best one-sentence summary of it.

canyonwalker: I see dumb people (i see dumb people)
I was an attendee on a webinar today when someone, one of the moderators I believe, used the toilet with an open mic.

At first it sounded like someone was running water, kind of like filling a coffee maker, in the background. It wasn't either of the active speakers because they were on camera. Though it could have been someone next to them, off camera. I posted a comment in the chat, "Mmm, I can smell the coffee! Or are you pouring water?"

The water-pouring sound continued, followed by what was evidently a toilet flush. "Sounds like someone took a mic in the toilet," I commented. There were LOLs.

Then came a loud fart. O-M-G. "Is this seriously your first videoconference ever?!" I wrote.

There were more LOLs. And at least one other person was thinking what I was thinking— that a movie warned us about this problem 35 years ago!


Link: The Sound of Relief, The Naked Gun (1988)

There were a few other jokes about the open mic in the bathroom, and which movie it was in decades ago. I went to screen-shot them to include in this blog, but minutes later the host had deleted most of the comments about what happened.

BTW, I noted above that this was a webinar. It was configured so that only the host and the two invited speakers could share audio. This wasn't one of those, "Oh, crazy stuff happens when there's 200 people on a Zoom" situations. It was a professionally staged presentation with a (supposedly) experienced host moderator and two speakers representing their companies— one of which is a household name in the US.

Oops.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
So, how did my "Taxing and Relaxing" weekend go? Well, other than that soak in the hot tub Saturday morning I posted about, there wasn't anything special in the relaxing category. I did take it easy around the house. That's a valid form of relaxation after 6 busy days of travel ending last Monday night.

In terms of taxing I finished my 2022 taxes. They took less time than I thought. That's because (a) I didn't have any new forms or situations this year so I was already familiar with all the gotchas I'd have to watch out for, and (b) I continue to settle in to the relationship my partner, TurboTax, allows with me.

My emotionally abusive relationship with TurboTax (Feb 2023)

I also started on my 2023 taxes. I've quipped before that one of the reasons tax time isn't so onerous for me is that I start 12 months early. What does that mean? Well, it doesn't mean that I'm pre-filling in forms a year in advance. I can't! Not only won't I know any of the numbers for another 12 months, but the forms won't even be published for probably 10 more months.

What I am doing is forecasting what my taxes will be. I've built a spreadsheet to estimate income, deductions, withholdings, and taxes due. I use the spreadsheet throughout the year to ensure that my withholdings are in line with what I'll ultimately owe in taxes. That lets me avoid the shocker of owing several thousands of dollars on tax day or the disappointment of finding that I've given the government a huge interest-free loan in the form of a massive tax refund.


canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Yesterday was the Superbowl, the biggest sports and TV event of the year in the US. I feel almost guilty I didn't watch (I went hiking instead) because apparently it was a nail-biter and— most importantly— the USA won for an unbelievable 57th straight year!

U-S-A! U-S-A!

USA Wins World Championship for 57th Straight Year! (Feb 2023)

Of course, it helps that this "world" championship sportsball game is only open to USA teams. 🤷

canyonwalker: Uh-oh, physics (Wile E. Coyote)
I used to be a big fan of The Onion, an online satire newspaper, years ago. I remember looking forward to new editions published online every Wednesday. Several years ago I stopped reading it because it had gotten... well, I don't think stale is the right word, though it had gotten a bit stale. The real problem was that current events in the US were getting so ridiculous, so absurd with obvious things that moneyed interests or political interests were clearly gaslighting us on, that attempts to write satire became unfunny. When the real news is full of leaders making a mockery of the truth— i.e., lying— with straight faces, there's no satire anymore.

Today I found a link in the news to an article in The Onion that reminds me of the classics of old. In fact it is old. It was originally published in 2013... and has been republished multiple dozen times since then. I checked on their website, and sure enough there's a new version of it today:

The Onion has been re-running this story after every mass shooting in the US for 9 years (screenshot Jan 2023)

The Onion re-publishes this article after many mass shootings in the US, changing only the byline and a few key words about where it occurred. Today's it about a shooting in Half Moon Bay, California, on Monday that killed 7 people.

The bulk of the article the The Onion keeps the same every time:

[C]itizens living in the only country where this kind of mass killing routinely occurs reportedly concluded Tuesday that there was no way to prevent the massacre from taking place. “This was a terrible tragedy, but sometimes these things just happen and there’s nothing anyone can do to stop them,” said New Hampshire resident Lisa Martin, echoing sentiments expressed by tens of millions of individuals who reside in a nation where over half of the world’s deadliest mass shootings have occurred in the past 50 years and whose citizens are 20 times more likely to die of gun violence than those of other developed nations. “It’s a shame, but what can we do? There really wasn’t anything that was going to keep this individual from snapping and killing a lot of people if that’s what they really wanted.” At press time, residents of the only economically advanced nation in the world where roughly two mass shootings have occurred every month for the past eight years were referring to themselves and their situation as “helpless.”

Sometimes, sadly, the most powerful satire is the bare truth.

Though there's one thing they get wrong in the article. They note mass shootings occur twice a month. The true number is more, way more. Mass shootings occur in the US on average at least once a day.


[Updated 25 Jan 2023 for spelling, clarity, and accuracy.]
canyonwalker: Cheers! (wine tasting)
"Dry January" has become a meme. It's not even new this year. A quick web search reveals that it started 10 years ago with just a few thousand people. Now it's all over social media. Didn't we just do this a few months ago with Sober October?

Not that I'm trying or anything, but as the clock wound past 10pm this evening I thought to myself, "Hmm, I haven't alcohol today... and I don't need a drink now." Then I thought for a moment, "Hmm, how close am I to Dry January?" In a moment I remembered this is probably only the second day so far (out of 9) this month I haven't consumed beer, wine, or liquor. 🤣

See, my notion of Dry January is more like this:

Dry January Drink Specials

I don't mean to take anything away from people who've struggled with alcoholism and have gone totally dry. There are a few in my family and several among my friends. I also don't mean to take anything away from people for whom Dry January is an opportunity to recognize they have a problem and take strong steps to correct it. I roll my eyes, though, at the people spraining their shoulders to pat themselves on the back on social media for taking a brief break from drinking— before returning to their old habits, including bragging about drunken antics on social media.


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (movies)
Recently we watched the movie, The Hitman's Bodyguard. It's from 2017 and stars Ryan Reynolds and Samuel L. Jackson.

The Hitman's Bodyguard (2017)

With two action-adventure stars cast in the film you'd expect it to be a good action-adventure movie. And it is. Reynolds' character is an elite but down-on-his-luck bodyguard (he loses a major client in the opening act) called upon to escort Jackon's killer-for-hire character to a trial where he's to provide testimony about a war criminal. Said war criminal has armies of goons trying to stop Jackson from testifying. There are lots of car chases and shoot-outs.

What you might not expect from a movie co-starring Samuel L. Jackson is that it's also a comedy. Well, you might expect that knowing how Ryan Reynolds tends to play things, e.g., in the Deadpool movies. A glance at the movie poster I've included here (it's a cheeky one— not all are) hints the movie's a satire of the bodyguard genre. Thankfully it's not a parody of the Kevin Costner/Whitney Houston movie The Bodyguard (1992). That movie was so bland I don't even think it's worth satirizing. (Sort of like how Weird Al Yankovic has said certain popular songs were too simplistic to parody.)

The humor angle of the movie is basically Reynolds and Jackson trash-talking each other. That plus the fun of the car chases and shootouts makes it worth watching. Turn off your brain (since the show's logic is fairly weak) and enjoy the action scenes and repartee.


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (movies)
A few weeks ago we watched "Weird: The Al Yankovic Story". It's available streaming for free on the Roku channel. How was it? Well, it was... just too weird. I hated it.

I know that's a strong statement. You might think, "Well, you just don't 'get' parody." (BTW, if you think that you have no clue about me.) Let me contextualize it.

Weird: The Al Yankovic Story (2022)I loved Weird Al's music since 1984, when "Eat It", his parody of Michael Jackson's hit "Beat It", came out. I heard it on the radio, and it was like a revelation to me. Music could be funny! And not just slapstick or bathroom humor funny, but poke-fun-at-things-that-people-hold-sacred funny. I.e., satire.

I told all my friends at school about it. At first nobody knew what it was. They all cracked up laughing when I repeated some of the lyrics, though. Soon more of us heard it on the radio— but not very often. I got bold and called a DJ to play it so my friends and family could all hear it.

I remained a fan of Weird Al's parodies for years. I bought a few of his albums. I eagerly watched the movie UHF (1989) as soon as I found out Yankovic wrote & starred in it. I think when I rented it on VHS I watched it 3 times in one weekend, then rented it again 9 months later.

Thus I was pretty primed to see "Weird: The Al Yankovic Story." Perhaps because of the title (which I took literally) I expected it to be a biography. A funny biography, to be sure; and likely parodying the biopic genre, as parody is at the heart of what Weird Al does. And that's where my dislike for the movie spawned.

You see, Weird is not a biography. It starts out as a sort of parody/biography, taking satirical liberties with the truth— which is exactly what I was expecting— but then gradually becomes completely unmoored from reality. Pretty soon it's a Weird Al self glorification fest on LSD, and it's not amusing.

Among the run-on jokes I found tedious:

  • Al's parents hate him, like sadistically hate him, and treat him as a failure even when he's objectively successful

  • Al insists repeatedly that he wrote Eat It as an original song, not a work of parody, and Michael Jackson wrote a little-known parody based on it

  • Madonna threw herself at Al, made him an alcoholic, and tried to turn him into a murderous drug cartel leader.

Let me reiterate: these gags were funny at first, but like too many jokes Saturday Night Live runs into the ground in their many bad seasons, they were made unfunny by excessive repetition.

As I sat through to the end of the movie I was reminded of what a writing teacher said to one of my classmates years ago about his absurdist comedy story written in the fashion of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. "John," he said— I think his name was John— "Your story is like a hot air balloon with no ropes. It rises and it's beautiful. But it's not moored to the ground of reality. It starts floating away, further and further away from reality, until the audience can't make sense of it anymore."

"Weird: The Al Yankovic Story" is that untethered balloon floating farther and farther away.


canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
On our drive to Barstow yesterday we took some detours across the Central Valley to avoid traffic slowdown. Our initial route plan was to drive I-5 from near Los Banos to Buttonwillow, then cross over to Bakersfield. Then I-5 crapped up, and real-time traffic apps recommended we drive 152 east from Los Banos to 99 then south. But then 99 crapped up, too. The maps suggested we drive a variety of county and local roads to avoid the jams. We're pretty bored with the two usual routes, so we figured, Sure, let's do it.

The roads took us through little bits of the Central Valley we've never seen before. For example, we finally saw the town of Firebaugh. We've only ever seen it by its name on road signs in the middle of nowhere. As in, "Firebaugh, 20 miles deeper into nowhere -->."

We also saw lots of hawks on the roadside. They were perched on telephone posts, power line pylons, lamp posts, etc.

We also saw lots of bird boxes. Most farms have them on near the edge of their orchards. Some of the mystery was revealed when we saw a big sign advertising Barn Owl enclosures. We passed a shop that builds & sells them. It was near Firebaugh. And right past that we saw another owl box... with a huge red-tail hawk sitting atop it.

Yeah, that's not going to attract owls. Think, a combination of "It's a trap!" and a riff on the signs you see for new housing/apartments... "If you lived here, you'd be dead already."
canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics today published the much anticipated consumer price index (CPI) for October. Economists' consensus was that it'd come in at 7.9%. That'd be a high rate, though less than June's 9.1%, a 40 year peak, or even last month's 8.2% level. Well, the figure came in slightly less bad than expected: only 7.7%. But Wall Street went wild.

Inflation is "only" 7.7%, Wall Street goes wild! (Nov 2022)

Stocks went on a tear today. The S&P 500 index rose 5.5%. The tech-heavy NASDAQ rose more than 7.3%. Within the technology sector heavy hitter Apple was +7.3%, Amazon +12.2%, NVidia +14.3%.

While traders on Wall Street were living it up, I was out grocery shopping on Main Street. The price of the carton of milk I bought today was 13% higher than just one week ago.

It's not just milk that's getting more expensive. Across the past year I've seen prices on many grocery staples rise by 50% or more.

"Why isn't the inflation number higher, like 50%, then?" you might ask.

It's because the official inflation metric used excludes "volatile" things like food. Riiight, one of the core necessities of life, food, is excluded from the statistics.


canyonwalker: I see dumb people (i see dumb people)
Billionaire Elon Musk, the world's richest man, completed his purchase of Twitter this week for $44 billion. It's widely believed that he paid way too much. Even Musk believed that his offer was too high— as he tried for months to get out of it after making a formal offer. He only went through with the purchase when Delaware Chancery Court turned aside his requests to halt a lawsuit filed by Twitter for non-performance of contract. Obviously he thought he would lose... worse than lose, actually. He would have been forced to purchase the company for $44 billion and been embarrassed by public release of various documents about his behavior. So he paid his $44 billion to stay in control of the narrative.

As "Chief Twit" one of his first narrative choices was announcing that Twitter verified accounts, those marked by the blue check mark, would cost $20/month to keep.

Lucille Bluth, stereotypical out-of-touch wealthy person (Arrested Development)

Musk was stung by criticism that he was out of touch. Memes flew, including variations on this classic quip from character Lucille Bluth in the TV series Arrested Development, poster woman for unempathetic rich people.

Musk lowered the proposal to $8 and fired back with a meme of his own, as seen in this tweet:

Elon Musk, honorary Lucille Bluth family member (Nov 2022)

In case you can't see the picture, Musk compared people whining about $8/month for Twitter Verified to those thinking $8/cup for a Starbucks coffee product is a bargain.

Aside from whatever sneering disdain one may have for $8 Starbucks drinks and/or people who spend $8/drink at Starbucks, there's a fundamental mismatch in this comparison. When you spend $8 at Starbucks, or even $1.95 at Dunkin' Donuts, you're the customer and you're buying a product. That's it.

With Twitter, everyone who tweets is giving Twitter the product, i.e., their content, for free. Twitter then uses that free content to attract audiences that it sells to advertisers. Verified users with those blue check marks are generally those most frequent contributors vendors giving Twitter stuff for free. Now Musk wants to charge these vendors without whose unpaid work the company literally would be nothing.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Thursday was Day 2 for me at the trade show in Detroit. It wasn't as long as a day as marathon Day 1 on Wednesday when I was on my feet for 10½ hours. Today the booths were open only 7 hours. Despite the shorter day I still got home late after staying out a bit with colleagues I haven't seen f2f in years and didn't have time for my blog. So I'm catching up a day later as I sit at the airport waiting to go home.

A few things I saw at the show Thursday really amused me. First were a bunch of "No Guns" signs at all the entrances. When I see them I think of them like this:

Say "Welcome to America" without saying "Welcome to America"

One of the many things at the show is a merch market. The label on this t-shirt amused me a lot:

The label on this shirt is way more amusing than it should be (Oct 2022)

In case you're wondering what the joke is, it's a GLBTQ rainbow with a "STRAIGHT" sticker on it— which is supposed to refer to the shape of the t-shirt, straight vs. fitted. Alternatively it's a perfect shirt for "Straight but not narrow". 🤣


canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Trade Show Day 1 is in the books now. I got back to my hotel at almost 9pm. It was a long day! I was working already before 8am, trying to get a demo into shape. By 9:15 I was at the convention center. At 10:30am the exhibitor hall opened. And then it was almost nonstop until 8pm.

One amusing bit about the show today was that across from our booth is a job postings board. It's a white board where people (mostly) freehand notes about what they're looking to hire. I thought about going up there and writing

Do you ❤️ your job?
Good, because we're NOT HIRING!


See also: my company's small layoff a few weeks ago.

Keep reading: More humor from Day 2 at the show!


canyonwalker: Winter is Coming (Game of Thrones) (game of thrones)
Last night I watched Game of Thrones Season 3 Episodes 2-3. This blog post isn't about those specific episodes as much as it's about what happened when I browsed The Game of Thrones Wiki today to understand a few scenes I was confused about. The pages that detail individual episodes are great. They provide lots of information about what's happening— including critical details that are sometimes really not obvious in the TV screenplay— without spoiling what happens later in the story. When you click a link to read more about an interesting character, though, watch out!

Game of Thrones: Everybody Dies

The "bios" on individual characters all have opening sentences like, "Person X did A and B until they were killed by C during D." I clicked on pages for 3 characters and all 3 of them had spoilers like that right at the top.

At first I was frustrated about this. The wiki writers could have done much better to not spoil the series for people who are just watching it for the first time! But then I considered what anybody who hasn't been living under a rock for the past 10 years already knows: In The Game of Thrones basically everybody dies.

Game of Thrones: Everybody Dies

I'm not even the first to think about that. Millions of fans have been frustrated about it.

Game of Thrones: Everybody Dies

I had fun looking up memes about how "Everybody Dies" in Game of Thrones. I've included in this blog post some of my favorites.

Game of Thrones: Everybody Dies

Game of Thrones: Everybody Dies

Game of Thrones: Everybody Dies

No, I won't tell you which three characters I clicked on and learned are goners. Unlike seemingly everyone else, I won't spoil the story for you! ...Except to remind you, of course, that basically everyone dies. 🤣

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Humorous images and memes about couples having trouble sharing the bed sheets have been around for years. One partner grabs way more of the covers than is left for the other. Even manufacturers have gotten in on the joke with novelty sheets such as these:

Not sharing the bed sheets evenly?

Usually it's the woman who's portrayed as the blanket hog, though not always.

This solution to sharing bed sheets evenly doesn't actually work

My partner and I used to have problems like these... though without resorting to solutions like hammer and nails. She'd go to bed first and have the blanket all scrunched up, and I'd have to pull it off her when I came to bed to straighten it so we could share.

Even when we were sharing the covers close to 50/50 there'd still be problems. It was too far up, so my feet stuck out the bottom (I'm much taller). Or it wouldn't cover down both sides well enough, a particular concern in the winter when we sometimes kept our heat a bit lower.

One solution we tried was to buy oversized sheets. We bought a king size blanket for our queen size bed. That helped with some of the doesn't-go-all-down problems but still didn't solve the blanket hog type problems.

The best solution we figured out a few years ago is just use two sheets. With different sheets and blankets on the bed for her and me there are almost never conflicts over who has how much of it. There's a whole sheet or blanket for each of us!

The two-sheets approach also solves differences in preferred temperature, weight, and texture. I usually like a thinner sheet while she prefers a heavier blanket. With one sheet or blanket shared, it was almost impossible to satisfy both of us. Now we're both routinely comfortable.

We also have differences in preferred texture. The sheet and blanket I like the feel of best, she finds "itchy". The blanket she likes best, I hate the feel of when it touches my skin. Now we don't have to negotiate on who gets their way. We both get our way, every time.

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 10:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios