canyonwalker: Y U No Listen? (Y U No Listen?)
Last week the program Marketplace on NPR ran a series of stories entitled "The Age of Work". Tuesday night I tuned in during a long car trip and listened to the episode In Tennessee county, an aging population means business opportunity.

"We start today in the middle of a line dancing class," host Kai Ryssdal started, "Because, silly as it might seem, the people in this class are the driving force behind a changing economy."

"You're talking about Boomers," I said back to the radio. "Boomers are the driving force behind a changing economy. And that's not news because Boomers have been the driving force behind pretty much every change in society, politics, and the economy for the past 60 years!!"

Indeed that's the whole gist of not just this episode but the whole series. A social trend is stretching and shifting to accommodate the needs of the Baby Boomer generation. Gosh, where have I heard that before? How about "Everywhere" and "For my entire life."

In this episode the story is about clubs and businesses in small, remote Cumberland County, Tennessee, that are thriving as they serve the needs of a burgeoning retiree population. The program's host and writers picked Cumberland in conjunction with payroll company ADP because ADP's data show it has the highest average age workforce in the US. What's happening today in Cumberland is coming soon to your community, the hosts tell us, like never before in the world has anyone seen things shift to favor the needs of Boomers.

The first business the show spotlights is the one Ryssdal quips about in the opening: a dancing class. It's full of seniors. It's pretty much all seniors. And it's totally crazy how it's so busy... at 9:30am on a Tuesday. Who could possibly want to take a dance lesson at 9:30am on a weekday? the host says in so many words.

"Because they're retired," I said back to the radio. Retirees can take dance lessons at 9:30am on a Tuesday. Especially when they're cheap, like $5 for a full hour if not longer.

"And do you know why it's only retirees there?" I continued. Well, aside from the fact that younger people might be literally barred from attending. Age discrimination is illegal in the US... but only when it discriminates against older people. Telling the young to kick rocks is socially and legally acceptable.

So, aside from having the police called on them and possibly being arrested for disturbing the peace if they make a fuss about wanting to dance, too, why aren't more younger people at this just-$5, 9:30am-on-a-Tuesday dance lesson?

How about, because a) School, and b) Work?

Seriously, how is this considered news. People under 65 are mostly busy with school or work on a Tuesday morning. And of those not in school or paid work, many of the rest are busy with the unpaid work of raising children at home. My mom was a stay-home parent for several years during my childhood, and never once during that period did she have time on a Tuesday morning to join an adult dance lesson at the town's rec center.

Speaking for myself now, as a child-free adult, I would've loved to have an opportunity like inexpensive dance lessons anytime the past 30 years... but again, not on a weekday morning. Dance lessons at 8pm? Sure! But those are rare. And even more rarely just $5.

The cheap classes on everything at the community center are at... drum roll, please... weekday mornings. Nights and weekends the community center is generally closed, locked, and dark. Programs like these have always been offered during the day, because people who teach them and support them by operating the facility only work during the day, making them implicitly only for people who don't have to work during the day. So they've always been implicitly, if not also explicitly, for retirees. And now because Boomers are retirees it's news!
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Over the past several years I've made a habit of using New Year's as a time to reflect on, and take stock of, the year just finished. It's time for the 2025 edition, looking back on 2024.

It's always a question how to title these annual reflections. Last year I struggled for weeks over how to frame the malaise that dominated 2023, the sense of doom about to arrive that never did yet made it hard to appreciate the good things that happened. What I came up with then was 2023: The Year That Was. Alas, 2024 felt like more of the same. There were some good things in there, some moments of near greatness even, but most of them were coupled with setbacks and worry about the future. Thus I'll title it 2024: Another Year That Was.

Travel & Experiences: Positive

As I break it down to understand what was good or bad about 2024, one aspect of 2024— like in 2023— that I feel warm about is travel and experiences. 2024 was another strong year for going places and having fun. In 2024:

  • We visited New Zealand on a two week trip, spending time on both main islands. It was our first trip to NZ. Heck, it was our first two week trip anywhere. I hope this is a sign of more things to come, soon.

  • We visited Panama for 8-9 days. There were many frustrations on that trip, but I try to think of it as overall a positive experience overall. Certainly I'm happier having gone, however far from perfect it turned out to be, than staying home or traveling anywhere domestically.

  • We had a mostly expenses paid trip to Mexico for Club. We stayed in two nice hotels— so nice that we didn't even want to leave our rooms.

  • We dropped our pace on weekend trips during the summer. That's on us. Though we did pick up toward the end of the summer again with Friday Night Halfway trips.

Friends & Family: Slightly Negative

2024 was another year of seeing my count of family and friends dwindle. It's not as severe as 2023 when I had to fire a few people from the position of being friends. I did lose one elderly relative, my Aunt Carol, to the infirmities of old age. She was 87.

One of the side effects of getting older is that most of your relatives and friends get older, too. Those who were the elders when I was young, my grandparents' generation: they're long gone already. Now many of my parents' generation are gone, too. Well, I still have my mom, though she's got many issues. And my wife still has both her parents. But for how long.

Finances: Positive, despite a Setback

2024 was another good year financially. Our savings for (early) retirement grew by about 16% due to market improvement, plus we continued to save aggressively to grow our portfolio even bigger. Our savings rate was less aggressive than the past few years, though, as Hawk lost her job early in the year. If not for that, and her difficulty in finding a suitable new job (she's been job-searching for 9 months), we might be at our early retirement goal already.

I do need to point out that, under the heading of money, 2024 has felt like a Dickensian situation of, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." In 2023, widespread belief that an economic recession was perpetually just 3-6 months away overshadowed positive actual economic figures, creating social anxiety about the economy. In 2024 widespread anxiety continued, though the bogeyman changed from an expected recession that never came to concern over inflation. A few years of elevated inflation after a historic 10+ year run of near zero inflation has people freaking out— somewhat rightly— about the future if prices continue to rise like that.

One of the aspects of "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" is that not everybody experienced the pain of inflation or benefits of the rising market equally. In 2024 the rich got richer, the extremely rich got way richer, and everybody else got squeezed. 2024 is hardly the first time that's happened, of course. In fact in the US it's pretty much par for the course.

Which camp am I in? Honestly I've got one foot in each. I'm well off enough after years of working hard and saving prudently that I benefited from the growth of the stock market in 2024. But I'm also still close enough to the working class / middle class my wife and I grew up in that we're very well aware of the struggle of people lower down the ladder than us. And we feel the pains, too, of seeing our health care costs, for example, grow by more than $20k year-over-year as health insurers find ever more ways to cut back on what they cover. At least we can afford that $20k increase without it forcing a dilemma of, "Do we see the doctor or buy groceries this week?"

Career: Mostly Negative

I enjoyed a bit of job recognition early in the year when I won nomination to president's club at my company. That provided a fun vacation to Mexico but alas not the stepping stone in my career I was looking for. I.e., I've been angling for a substantial increase in job title, to recognize the level of skill and capability I demonstrate, but that didn't come. And with yet-again new leaders in my department since then I've now actually fallen backward a few steps yet-again as the new managers yet-again expect me to start over at square one in proving myself.

New management is also frustrating in other ways. I won't elaborate specifics here as I'm keeping this blog open, but let's just say multiple signs are telling me it's past time to leave. Hint: the sacking of the whole rest of my team earlier this week is one example. That's sad because I've been with this company for over 7 years and have had some good times and done some great work here.

The notion of it being time to find a new job is complicated by the fact I'm looking to retire soon. I really don't want to start a new job just to work it for a short period of time. When I decide I'm done here, am I done-done? As in ready to retire?

I've been holding on in this deteriorating job for a few years now, telling myself I'm on a glide path. I've swallowed my frustration at numerous things for a few years, telling myself I've just got to keep gliding a little longer. Early in 2024 I thought I was ready to walk over management bullshit. The glow I enjoyed from telling off my boss died a few days later when Hawk and I learned that her job was being eliminated. So I've held onto my job a bit longer. How much longer now? I'd like to say this is the final year, perhaps even the final 4 months, but I'm not sure. Meanwhile the frustrations mount.

canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
Like a lot of people in the US I got an email message recently from the Social Security Administration (SSA) that their login process has changed and I would need to set up my new credentials. BTW, it's not a scam or phishing attempt; it's a real thing. And yes, I have an online Social Security account.

...No, I'm not earning Social Security. I'm still probably umpteen years from filing for benefits. But I created an account on their website many years ago because I'm curious about the money I've been paying in to the system since my first paycheck job at age 15.

The need to set up new login credentials for SSA was my prompt to visit the site to figure out the answer to a question I've been wondering about for some time now. What would my SS payments look like at regular retirement age if I retired early vs. worked several more years? I thought I'd have to poke around the site to and do a lot of numerical modeling on my own to answer that. To my pleasant surprise SSA now has a retirement calculator right there on the main page after logging in that can answer that question.

How much Social Security would I earn later if I quit working today? SSA website now has an estimate tool for that! (Jul 2024)

This chart shows the SS payments I'd earn, estimated, umpteen years from now if I stopped working— i.e., stopped paying in to the system— today. Actually, it's an estimate if I stopped paying in as of 12/31/2023, so I'm already a bit ahead of these forecasts with work and payments in 2024. The key is that value shown in blue in the middle drop-down box above the graph. I put in zero as my future annual salary. Already I've got a decent estimate benefit coming my way in the future.

To model out the difference between retiring early (in my early 50s) and continuing to work several more years I also put a larger number in that middle drop-down box. The difference if I work another several years, maxing out my SS benefit, is... not huge. I mean, it's also not trivial. I'm not including the second chart here, but the difference was about $300 a month if I file at first eligibility at age 62 and $500 a month if I want until the Full Retirement Age of 67. An extra few hundred a month is nothing to sneeze at... but it's also not a game-changer relative to the size of the benefit I've already earned.

What this exercise tells me is that even if I choose to stop working soon, in my early 50s, I've got a decent social security benefit waiting for me years down the road, thanks to what I've already paid into the system.

canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
A few weeks ago I read an article about some of the wisdom of Charlie Munger. Munger, who died last year at age 99, was famously the vice-chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, the corporate conglomerate controlled by the legendary Warren Buffett. In an article on Moneywise, ‘Who in the hell needs a Rolex watch?’: Why Charlie Munger warned Americans against ‘pretentious expenditures, the authors tell how Munger criticized people buying status symbols and yearning to have as much as the (wealthier) people around them. “I have conquered envy in my own life,” Munger famously said.

While I have great respect for Munger's business prowess, reading this article made me think, "Wealthy aging billionaire is out of touch with the 99.99%." I could quickly think of two reasons far better than tongue-clucking about envy why people— people who aren't billionaires— yearn for more and buy status symbols.

But first, Rolex watches? Okay, Boomer. 🤣 Seriously, affluent younger people are not buying Rolex. It's like your grandfather's Buick. Other brands lead mindshare among affluent people in their 30s and 40s, even some in their 50s, today.

Now, here are the two reasons other than "envy" that immediately came to mind for why people in the middle class, and especially the upper middle, strive for more:

1. Financial Security

The main reason I see why those of us who enjoy a certain degree of comfort today, i.e,, those of us who are middle class & upper middle class, keep striving for more is that we are trying to create financial security. Or, to put that in terms of another of Munger's aphorisms— to structure your planning around things you want to avoid—the imperative here is Don't die in poverty.

Building wealth in our working years has become critical to  avoid living old age in poverty. Older generations had retirement plans and confidence in Social Security. In Gen X we saw retirement plans largely disappear from the private sector when we were starting our careers. Union membership was trending down, as well. Today it's at 10% in the US– and half of that is in the public sector. Union membership in the private sector is 3%. We also saw from back in the early 1990s the upcoming demographic crunch in Social Security that will force significant benefit cuts by the time we reach retirement age. At the same time, medical costs have been spiraling ever higher. Lots of retirees with only modest nest eggs are being bankrupted by health costs. My cohort and I thus internalized from our early 20s, and have seen only further proof with every passing year, that when it comes to living in retirement, we're on our own to avoid poverty.

Even the Moneywise article points out that Munger's tongue-clicking about envy came as he was sitting on a multi-billion dollar pile of assets. Yeah, Richie Rich, you've got yours, 100 times over. You don't have to worry about a damn thing, and haven't for at least 50 years. Stop being a shit to those of us still trying to build even one one-hundredth of your wealth.

2. The Needs of Networking

Why do people "Keep up with the Joneses?" Sure, one reason is envy. But there's another reason, too. It's more subtle. Not everyone gets it. I sure didn't when I was younger and had a very STEM/academic mindset. As I've matured in my career in business, though, it's become very obvious. To get ahead in business you need the support of people with power and wealth. And to get that support from the powerful and wealthy, you need to meet them where they're at.

Where are they at? For one, they're playing golf. To climb the ladder in business you need to play golf— because golf is very much a sport of powerful in business, and lots of business networking happens on the golf course. Now, golf is expensive. You may need a membership in a club. Maybe a country club? That's actually not a bad idea because wealthy people networks are centered around country clubs. People you meet and can get introduced there can make the difference between your business ideas being embraced and funded, versus you being like the proverbial Hollywood waiter with a script nobody cares about.

Oh, and while you're driving to the golf course, or the country club, or even the sailing club— another place where the demographic of business leaders hangs out— you'll need to roll up in the right kind of car. And the right shoes, watch, etc. Yes, people make snap judgments about you in the first few seconds based on your appearance. Even the wealthy do that. If you roll up in a Toyota Camry, most of this demographic is not going to admire your fiscal sensibility. They're going to look right past you. You need not just a statement watch but a statement car.

Oh, and are your kids going to public schools? Ha ha ha, the wealthy and powerful people's kids are not. If you want to bond with them over your shared love of your kids, you need to send your kids to the same schools. Y'know, the ones that cost $50,000 a year. Per kid. And we're not talking Harvard, here. We're talking elementary school.

"But didn't Munger climb the business ladder without such expenses?" you might ask. Yes, he did. But one counter-example does not disprove a general fact. Munger was lucky enough to meet a fellow thrifty contrarian, Warren Buffett, early in his career. Very few of us ever get the chance to be hired by a unicorn like Buffett. I also note Munger also benefited from network connections in a different way— through family privilege. For example, when he was rejected from Harvard law school, a friend of his father's called up the dean of the school— the dean— and told him to admit Munger. Did Munger get through law school on his own merits? Yes; he graduated magna cum laude. But the challenge with succeeding on merit alone is that there are also more worthy applicants, whether it's for school or a promotion or a business investment, then there are spots for acceptance. The one whose worthy application gets accepted is the one that gets shuffled to the top of the pile by networking connections. And unless you're born into them, they cost money to build.

canyonwalker: Hangin' in a hammock (life's a beach)
Los Cabos Travelog #10
Waldorf Astoria Los Cabos - Mon, 6 May 2024, 7am

Yesterday was our last evening and now it's our last morning at the lovely Waldorf Astoria Los Cabos. Once again I'm spending the morning lounging on our terraza with a private pool, finding little reason to leave our amazing hotel room.

The Waldorf continues to impress us with its service. I've stayed at 4.5-star rated hotels before. Many of them have been nice, but they were basically just huge hotels with nice rooms. I'm not sure if this hotel is rated 5 stars but if it is, the thing that separates 5 star hotels from those with merely 4.5 stars is the service. Everything here has felt so personalized. When we arrived, we felt like we were the only people arriving. There was no line at check-in in the lobby. There wasn't even a lobby. There was an outdoors lounge, where we were escorted with our drinks in hand, where a registration agent sat down with us at a private table to explain the paperwork.

Then there's this....

The Waldorf Astoria left a card for Hawk... on our toy stuffed hawk! (May 2024)

When we returned from dinner out last night, the hotel had left a card for Hawk in our room. No, they didn't give us the stuffed hawk; that's a toy we brought because it amuses us to travel with it. But the hotel did put the note— addressed to "Ms. Hawk"— on the hawk. 🤣

The staff's continued use of her preferred name is just one example of the hotel's distinctive customer service.

Edit: "Hawk is retiring" is the answer I gave to the concierge after he asked me several times ahead of our visit if we were celebrating anything special this trip. "We're celebrating coming to this hotel" seemed to be a silly answer even if it was the most accurate, so I went with Hawk's suggestion on this. It's a bit of a lie because while she is enjoying a few weeks or months of time off between jobs, she is actively seeking another job. I've called this "practice retirement" in the past but didn't want to try translating into a foreign language.

canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
It's like a case of "Ask, and ye shall receive." After I posted earlier today about the increasing number of 401(k) millionaires and noted that that widely-reported news story only describes the top 2% of the population and doesn't say anything about how well the average American is saving for retirement, I see another article pop up in my newsfeed— this one also from Yahoo! Finance— about the median 401(k) balance (29 Feb 2024). This article shares data from another big brokerage, Vanguard, about the mean and median retirement account balances in 2023, broken down by age range:

AgeAverage
Account Balance
Median
Account Balance
Under 25$5,236$1,948
25-34$30,017$11,357
35-44$76,354$28,318
45-54$142,069$48,301
55-64$207,874$71,168
65+$232,710$70,620

* I've copied the numbers directly from the Yahoo! Finance article cited above and cleaned up the formatting with a table

These figures, especially the median figure, are much more insightful into how the average American is saving for retirement. (As an aside, it's not surprising that the mean average is much higher than the median. I've noted before that mean and median are often very different when discussing wealth.) The news is way different from any kind of champagne cork popping about how many 401(k) millionaires there are. In these numbers we see that ordinary Americans at or near retirement age lack even one-tenth that much wealth.


canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
There was good news in finance this week, at least for those fortunate enough to have a lot of it. Across 2023 more have a lot of it. Fidelity reported that the number of its customers who have retirement account balances of $1 million or more increased by 40% from a year earlier. Here's a chart of numbers published in this article in Yahoo! Finance (27 Feb 2024):

People with $1MM or more in retirement accounts at Fidelity (Yahoo! Finance, Feb 2024)

This isn't the first time Fidelity has published this kind of data, nor is it the first time multiple media outlets have excitedly reported it. (I chose Yahoo! Finance here because a) they made an insightful graph and b) they're not behind a paywall.) It's also not the first time I've written about these reports. When I wrote about Fidelity's report a year ago I was sour on the news coverage. Though that was because the articles I saw a year ago were poorly written, by authors who seemingly didn't understand what the data actually mean.

So, what do these numbers actually mean? What they are is a barometer of overall retirement account health. The number of people who have $1MM in one account, at one bank, went up 40% in a year. That's good news; don't get me wrong. But it's not an indicator of how many people overall have $1MM socked away for retirement, and it's not an indicator of how well the average person has saved for retirement.

I am part of this data set, BTW. I have a retirement account at Fidelity. Mine is one of those 45 million accounts mentioned in the citation in the chart above. But I am not one of the 401(k)/IRA millionaires in the headline.

Sad to say, I don't have $1MM in my Fidelity retirement account. I don't even have half that. And I'm better off, financially, than most Americans.

Part of that is that my retirement savings are split across multiple accounts at multiple financial institutions. Fidelity only sees a fraction of my portfolio. But even adding together all my retirement savings across 4 banks I'm still below $1MM currently. Will I get to a million eventually? Yes. I'm all but certain of that. But I'm not there yet.

So, what does it take for the approximately 813,000 people in Fidelity's report who are retirement millionaires? First, I'll just note that that's less than 2% of the total sample size. Those fortunate 2%, generally speaking, have been saving for many years to accumulate such balances. Fidelity says the average age of such accounts is 26 years. The account holders are mostly late career professionals or already retired. Fidelity says the average person in the set is 59 years old. They're likely also well paid— so they can afford to fund their 401(k)s aggressively— and benefited from things like employer matches. I say all this, BTW, as a well paid, late career professional who has saved aggressively— and isn't there yet. Like I said, I'm better off than most... but I'm not the top 2%.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Friday midday I walked out on a meeting with my boss and a colleague. The colleague was being disrespectful toward me, even after I told him I found his behavior disrespectful and asked him to stop. My boss had acknowledged the problem beforehand (it's part of a widening pattern) and offered to help address it. But in the meeting he did nothing as it happened again. I told both of them, "I'm done with this [disrespect] for today. Find someone else for this task if you have to," and then walked out. I took a few minutes to convince myself I'd done the right thing with some help from my spouse then circled back around to talk to my boss 1:1 to tell him I need to see significant improvement soon. I didn't explicitly say "Or I will quit" but IMO only a fool would fail to see that was clearly implied.

After that I left for the airport. I had been in Austin for a day and a half of technical training. I was glad I had a built-in excuse not to have to be around my offending colleague or my boss... though I did see my boss briefly outside while we were both waiting for Ubers. I remarked on something he said among a group of us who were waiting there that was unrelated to personnel issues. He didn't engage with me. That made it seem more awkward. Thus I was glad I would have some alone time for the next few hours to process things.

It turned out I had more processing time than I expected. The wifi on my flight back to SJC was busted. With little entertainment to occupy my mind I found myself mulling the situation over again and again. Like I wrote in my previous blog, it was a case of "shots fired". A shot, once fired, can't be taken back. And the shots I fired basically put me on a path of having to leave this company soon. As I considered the prospect of leaving this job in a messy breakup after almost 7 years together I found myself... surprisingly at peace with the situation.

I've written for years now that I've been planning an early retirement. The goal line to cross to get there hasn't been a date but rather a target amount of money in my portfolio. I'm not at my target yet— among other reasons, I've moved the goalposts twice due to inflation— but I'm getting close. And while leaving my job on a sour note isn't how I envisioned starting retirement, neither is having a totally upbeat going-away party with cake and streamers and everybody clapping. Walking out the door by myself while singing the chorus to "Take This Job and Shove It" (Wikipedia link) is perfectly adequate.

Realizing that I already have a post-job (or at least post-this-job) mentality was striking. And it was striking how refreshed I felt. Suddenly none of the things that have been bothering me about the job for... frankly, years... bothered me anymore. Even the most recent problems suddenly stopped bothering me.

  • I won't be prepared to deliver an in-person seminar on Wednesday because it was scheduled too soon against my recommendation and the material isn't ready? Fuck it, I don't care if I stand up there and look like an idiot as things fall apart around me. Soon it won't be my problem.

  • Getting pushed into starting an evaluation project with a customer prematurely, with expected delivery dates I've advised are almost impossible to meet but have been ignored repeatedly on? Fuck it, I don't care either if the sale slips and people yell at me.

  • Another (really weak) deal slips further out because coworkers keep trying to go around me instead of listening to me and believing me when I say what technical things we need to do? Fuck that, too. Their success is no longer my concern.


It's amazing how many problems just roll off like water on a duck's back when you just don't fucking care anymore.


canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Over the past several years I've made a habit of using New Year's as a time to reflect on, and take stock of, the year just finished. Ideally I would've shared my reflections on 2023 three weeks ago, at the turn of the new year. I've left this idling because it's been a challenge figuring out how to frame it. The challenge has been that my gut reaction to the question, "What was 2023 like?" has been basically Ugh, but when I start to consider specifics to substantiate that overall feeling of disgust, the facts don't support the negativity.

Why, then, the sense of malaise about 2023? That's the million dollar question, as "malaise" describes how many people felt, broadly, throughout the year. So many things, objectively, were good; yet there was such anxiety or over-emphasis on the negatives that it drove widespread overall pessimism.

Given this schism about whether 2023 was a good year or bad, I'm going to title it 2023: The Year That Was.

Travel & Experiences: Positive

As I break it down to understand what was good or bad about 2023, one aspect of 2023 that I should be feeling warm about is travel and experiences. 2023 was a strong year for going places and having fun, especially after the crimp that Coronavirus put on such things in 2020 through parts of 2021 and 2022. The joys seem too quickly fleeting so I remind myself:

  • How we traveled so much in April and May I felt like I wasn't working anymore. We had not one but two really fun long weekends at waterpark resorts in Phoenix; a great trip of several days in New Orleans and Mississippi; and a most-expenses paid trip to Cayman Islands. Oh, and a few other trips, too, in the span of 9 weeks.

  • We did two fantastic week-long trips, including a long-awaited trip to Australia at the end of December.

  • We took lots of shorter trips (2-3 days) that were still packed with activity, like that day we hiked 7 or 8 waterfalls in one day. Wait, which day was that; there were two such days!

Friends & Family: Negative

2023 was a year of seeing my count of family and friends dwindle. One I lost to cancer. I've written extensively about that over the past year so I won't belabor it here.

A few friends I lost because I fired them from the position of being my friend. It wasn't easy, and they (predictably) blamed me 100% for having to do it, but I decided it was necessary. When people carry on like complete jackasses, when they lie and distort, and when they attack me when I challenge them on their plain untruths, and when all the above is not just a misunderstanding or them having a bad day but is their true character, I don't wish to associate with them anymore. I will not stay silent for the purposes of "keeping the peace". There's nothing worth keeping.

So, I was down a few friends in 2023. On the other side of the ledger, I didn't really make any new friends. Maybe in another 20 years after real friends keep dying I'll wish for lying, offensive jackasses who'll talk to me as long as I don't call out their bullshit.

Finances: Positive (though everyone feels negative)

Money. If there's one aspect of life that's the poster child for malaise in 2023 it's money. By and large people spent the whole year worried about money. For most of the year nearly everybody was predicting an imminent recession. That's a big part of the malaise: people's anticipation of bad times to come was far worse than reality.

That's not to say 2023 was a banner year. It wasn't. There was strong growth in the top few companies in the stock market— the "Magnificent Seven" of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Netflix, and Nvidia— but the broader market spent most of the year struggling just to stay even. As recently as mid-November the rest of the market was slightly in the red for the year. A December rally brought things up into the black for 2023. Overall my portfolio finished up almost 15% (net of new cash added) for the year.

Why money matters: I watch my portfolio carefully because I aim to retire soon. With no pension (companies had largely done away with those by the time I entered the professional workforce) and not being close to 65 yet (or even 62) it's totally self funded. Even once I'm 65 I'll want plenty of self funding since the social safety net in the US is so spotty.

Career: Mostly Negative

I enjoyed a bit of job recognition early in the year when I won nomination to president's club at my company. That provided a fun vacation to the Caribbean but alas not the stepping stone in my career I was looking for. I.e., I've been angling for a substantial increase in job title, to recognize the level of skill and capability I demonstrate, but that didn't come. And with new managers in my department since then I've now actually fallen backward a few steps as the new managers expect me to start over at square one in proving myself.

New management is also frustrating in other ways. I won't elaborate specifics here as I'm keeping this blog open, but let's just say multiple signs are telling me it's past time to leave. That's sad because I've been with this company for over 6 years and have had some good times and done some great work here.

The notion of it being time to find a new job is complicated by the fact I'm looking to retire soon. I really don't want to start a new job just to work it for a short period of time. When I decide I'm done here, am I done-done? As in ready to retire? I've been holding on in this deteriorating job for a few years now, telling myself I'm on a glide path. I've swallowed my frustration at numerous things for a few years, telling myself I've just got to keep gliding a little longer. How much longer now? I'd like to say this is the final year but I'm not sure. Meanwhile the frustrations mount.

canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
I saw an interesting article about saving money the other day. "A couple who retired early with $4.3 million says the FIRE lifestyle is wearing thin: ‘We don't want to just keep throwing money on the pile and keep being cheap.’" The story has been picked up by a number of news outlets. Here's a Yahoo! article link (25 Jun 2023) because it's the least likely to disappear behind a paywall. The story tells of a couple, Mindy and Carl, who are multi-millionaires but spend too much time and emotional energy agonizing over small purchases. Their habit of extreme frugality has made it hard for them to enjoy the fruits of their labor.

Let me offer a definition here for those who are wondering. "FIRE" is Financial Independence/Retire Early. The term was coined in 1992, in the book Your Money or Your Life. The FIRE movement, as it's often called, has gotten closer to the mainstream in recent years as bloggers and influencers have popularized it with younger generations of adults getting an early start on planning ahead for retirement.

The idea of FIRE is simple: you save aggressively, and invest your money wisely, building a portfolio of assets big enough to make you financially independent (FI-), enabling you to quit your job and retire early (-RE). How big is "big enough"? Big enough that the cash flow you earn from your investments basically replaces your need for salaries. And how aggressive is "save aggressively"? Ah, there's the rub.

Typical FIRE success stories tell of couples who worked well-paying professional jobs for as little as 10 years, saved every penny they could, and retired by age 40. Common in these stories is financial self-denial. People take their upper-middle class incomes from jobs as software developers, finance pros, and lawyers and budget themselves like starving grad students. They live in small, plain apartments or houses, even leeching off generous parents if they can to avoid paying for housing, stint on travel and material goods, and eat meals of cheap foodstuffs like rice and beans.

Let me emphasize, people who live in shared housing, or buy cheap groceries and rarely eat out, or own a bicycle instead of a car because they can't afford more are different from FIRE followers. FIRE people typically earn 6 figures, often well into the 6 figures, and save half or more of their pay.

One of my computer-engineer colleagues in the late 1990s was a FIRE adherent. Instead of renting an apartment in pricey Silicon Valley he kept a bedroll under his desk at the office and slept there. He showered at the company gym in an adjoining building and kept a few of his possessions locked in the trunk of his well-used economy car down in the parking garage. "I'm saving an extra $15k a year not paying rent and utilities!" he boasted. Today the figure would be at least double.

Sleeping under your desk and showering at the office to avoid renting an apartment may seem like taking frugality to an extreme, but that's the sort of tradeoff FIRE adherents seriously consider. I've always been a frugal person myself, or at least have always had frugal tendencies— see my example from a few years ago about how long I wore a pair of sandals before spending to replacing them— but to me that's beyond the pale. I decided back in school that as I embarked on a well-paying career I would strike a balance between saving money for the future and enjoying the fruits of my labor in the present.
canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
A news story has popped up in my newsfeed multiple times this past week, as different outlets picked up on it. A study released recently found that retirees fear running out of money more than death. When I first saw that headline I thought about it for a moment and said, "Well, duh!"

In the US running out of money in older age is a real, legitimate concern. We are nearly alone among G20 nations for our weak social safety net. We're at least better at supporting the elderly poor than the poor of any other age. We have Social Security and Medicare. Though Social Security a) generally only provides subsistence level living expenses and b) is based on how much a person paid into the system through payroll deductions during their working years— so people who had lots of low wage work, or had trouble finding/performing work, get a smaller benefit. That's a double whammy because such people are also the most likely not to have any personal savings for retirement.

Running out of money in retirement is my biggest retirement concern, too. It's a way more remote possibility for me because I'm comfortably well off right now, but stuff can change. The US is practically alone among the G20 in that "medical bankruptcy" is a thing here. Because of our costly health care system and all the gaps in coverage, people who suffer a major long-term illness can find themselves spending $50,000, $100,000, or more a year just to survive.

I don't fear death. When I'm dead I'm gone. What I do fear is dying slowly in a way that leave me bankrupt. Imagining the choice between living out my days in poverty or accepting a preventable early death terrifies me.

canyonwalker: Sullivan, a male golden eagle at UC Davis Raptor Center (Golden Eagle)
French President Emmanuel Macron has been pushing proposed changes to the country's retirement system for... well, since his reelection campaign. His proposals have proved deeply unpopular, though. The French parliament made clear it would not enact them, so Macron is using a constitutional loophole to change them through executive order. Protests that have been going on for weeks turned violent late last week.

What's at stake may seem quaint to us Americans. Macron wants to increase the retirement age from 62 to 64. Here in the US the "full" retirement age is already 67 (for people born since 1960). And it's not just we Americans who work longer than the French. In Germany the retirement age is 65 years 7 months. In the UK it's 66.

Macron's reason for pushing the reform is the same as that of various US politicians who've been calling for Social Security reform for decades: the system is unsustainable. While the math is pretty clear that US Social Security will start running short of money as soon as 2033 unless something major is changed, it's not so clear how much financial jeopardy France's retirement system faces. Partly that's because it's funded differently, paid out of general taxes rather than through a separate system of levies. The same demographic realities that imperil the US system, though— longer life expectancy and declining population growth— underlie pension cost increases in France.

Social Security in the US has been called "the electrified third rail of politics", a term popularized by Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill in 1982. The metaphor refers to public safety warnings common at the time about the dangers of touching the high-voltage third rail in many electric railway systems. Touching it is often deadly. Macron may find grabbing that third rail kills his political career.

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
A few days ago I saw an article that caught my eye, "America's 401(k) millionaires have plunged by a third" (CBS MoneyWatch 24 Feb 2023). It's interesting because (a) I watch news about investing and retirement; and (b) it's another article in a line of junk statistics about 401(k) accounts I've seen covered in the news.

The reason it's junk is that they're taking data from just one brokerage company, Fidelity. The real statistic is that of accounts held at Fidelity, there are one-third fewer with balances of over $1 million. Why does that make a difference? Well, for the literal headline it makes a small difference, but it renders false most of the other statements in the body of the article.

Why are the conclusions false? ...Or unsupported, if you'd prefer a softer word? It's because most people don't have all their retirement money in a single account. For example, I have four retirement accounts spread across three different brokerages. And I'm not alone. Other articles in the same few past days have reported that most Americans have fragmented retirement accounts. (Fragmented is not necessarily bad, BTW. Mine are fragmented mostly because they're different types of accounts. I manage them all, and they're all working efficiently.)

BTW, it's not just one news media company that doesn't really "get" retirement math, it's basically all of the general media. Numerous other news outlets ran the virtually the same story. Why don't they get it? Frankly it's because most retirement articles in the general media are written by 23-year-olds with little financial education or life experience. Moreover they may be  overseas contractors who have no cultural familiarity with American retirement systems. Or possibly they're AIs that only know how to draw straight-line (if erroneous) conclusions from simplistic data presented to them.
canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Over the past several years I've made a habit of using New Year's as a time to reflect on, and take stock of, the year just finished. Recently I've posted a few retrospectives about travel. That's only one part of my life. As I've mentally composed this article about everything else I've wondered what the theme would be. Like, if there's a title for 2022: My Experience, what would it be?

It struck me over lunch today. 2022: Stuck in a Holding Pattern.

Coronavirus: The New Normal

The long shadow that Coronavirus continued to cast over 2022 is part of the feeling of being stuck in a holding pattern. I remember at the end of 2020 I expressed cautious hope that 2021 would be the year we beat Coronavirus. Vaccines with strong trial results were rolling out. It seemed the only challenge was how fast we could get to 90%+ uptake and start seeing the virus basically eradicated as has been done with smallpox and measles.

Alas by mid 2021 it was evident that people's mindsets had hardened along partisan lines, with Republicans denying that the vaccines were necessary or even worked at all. 2022 continued more of the same. There's still a stubborn 30% of the US population who refuse to be vaccinated. There's an even larger portion who oppose common-sense public health precautions like wearing masks in indoors public spaces.

Meanwhile we're seeing that the vaccines are not a "silver bullet". Unlike with smallpox and measles, the Coronavirus mutates just fast enough to work its way around vaccine induced immunity. That's not a reason not to get vaccinated, BTW. The vaccines still help, not only reducing your chances of infection by 2-3x but also reducing chances of severe symptoms by 6x.

It just feels like we never managed to fully turn the corner from 2020. It's like instead of 2020, 2021, and 2022 the years have been, movie title style:

  • 2020

  • 2020 Won

  • 2020, Too


I'd say that 2023 is safe from 2020 homophones... except that it could still be "2020 III".

Health

I left 2022 in the same health I started it. Really I should work on getting healthier, especially losing some of the multiple spare tires I've been lugging around for years. I'm not sure when I'll break out of that holding pattern.

One upside of 2022 being same-same for me is that I didn't get Covid. Partly that's preparation: I got fully vaccinated as soon as I reasonable could, and I've gotten all the boosters available. Partly it's caution: I've continued to wear a mask in indoors public spaces and avoid the riskiest situations (aside from airports and aircraft when I travel). And partly it's just luck— or at least things I can't take credit for as deliberate choices. For example, when my spouse got Covid this past year I managed to avoid it!

Friends & Family

I'm going to damn 2022 with the same faint praise I damned 2021 with: At least nobody died.

Continuing to manage through The New Normal of the pandemic-turned-endemic meant not having as many chances to socialize with friends and family as in The Before Times. I haven't made any new friends recently that I can think of. Worse, I've chosen to fire a number of people from the position of being my friend. As I explained in Less Patience for Sucky People the forced alone time of the pandemic gave me a clearer perspective on whether people I counted as friends from years ago were still being friends or if they'd dropped down to jerks whose behavior I don't find amusing, or even tolerable, anymore.

Career

My career is definitely a "stuck in a holding pattern" situation. I continue to stick with a job where I'm underemployed and am being given no support to develop or advance meaningfully. Yes, I've requested it. A few times. Yes, I could push on it even harder— or just find a better job. But like I noted a year ago, I'm pretty much out of fucks to give. I'm being paid reasonably well, even if it is 25-40% less than I'd be making if my career hadn't been stalled the past 10 years. I believe I can retire in a few years. More on that below. Why scratch and claw to get ahead when I can relax on a glide path? There are some benefits to being in a holding pattern.

Finances

2022 has not been a great year financially. The S&P 500 was down 19% in 2022; some indexes were down even more. The silver lining to this cloud is that I actually beat the index in the non-retirement accounts I manage. I finished 2022 down only 6% there. In our retirement accounts we lost 15-16% for the year. I have less control over investing that money. At least we still beat the market there.

I track our investments closely because they're key to us being able to retire soon. What's "soon"? Several years ago I said to myself and my wife: Five Good Years. All we'd need is five good years, then we'd have enough to retire.

I knew when I made the mantra Five Good Years that it wouldn't be just 5 years on the calendar. Markets go down some years. I figured 5 good years would actually take about 7 years, allowing for one down market cycle in the period. How's that worked out? Well, across the past 7 years we've only had three good years, financially. We still need two more good years.

UPDATE: I forgot to explain why I'm overall satisfied with our financial situation at the end of 2022. It's not just, "Ooh, we lost less than the market." Silver-lining-to-a-dark-cloud is never satisfying. What's positive about our finances in 2022 is that we continued to save money, bigly. We set another new record for money saved in 2022. Basically we're living on one salary and saving the other. ...Actually we're living on less than one salary and saving the rest. Aggressive savings has been part of my Five Good Years calculation since the beginning. I'm excited we're outperforming even aggressive goals.

The Year Ahead: More Holding Pattern?

I don't have strong expectations for 2023. I mean, I'd love to think that it's going to be a banner year, one of those last remaining Five Good Years, etc. I'd love to think that, but there's no indication it'll happen. Financially speaking, most people are expecting a recession in 2023. Of course, most people were expecting that for a lot of 2022, as well, which is a large part of why the market was down 19%. Expectation of a recession creates a recession. Maybe 2023 will be another year of a holding pattern... or maybe we'll break out the other side of the holding pattern during the year and finish strong. I hope for the latter but prepare for the former.


canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
Last week I wrote Coming Out Ahead with a 401(k) providing a simple example of how investing through a tax deferred account such as a 401(k) nets you more money than investing through a taxable account. Two things about that....

  • One, it was frankly too simple as it showed an investment that grew only through capital appreciation. Fewer than 20% of individual stocks in the S&P 500 fit that profile and pretty much no mutual funds do. And mutual funds are generally all that's available in employer sponsored 401(k) plans.

  • Two, the example showed the 401(k) coming out only 26% ahead after 20 years. 26% is nothing to sneeze at— we're talking 26% mo' money here— but shouldn't much-ballyhooed 401(k)s do even better than that?

It turns out that addressing one concern addresses both.

For Scenario 2, here, I'm going to change one of the assumptions from Scenario 1:

  • Instead of investing in stock XYZ, which grows 7% annually and pays no dividend, you invest in mutual fund PQRST, which grows 4% annually in addition to paying a 3% distribution annually.

All other assumptions remain the same.

Note that PQRST and XYZ have the same 7% compound annual growth rate but the way they deliver that growth is different. That difference has tax implications.

The math gets complex as now there's tax due every year in the taxable account (the distributions are taxed in the year they're paid) so I'll illustrate how Scenario 2A-B works with a spreadsheet:

Table 2a-b: Growth of $10k in taxable vs. tax-sheltered accounts (Dec 2022)

Click/tap the image to enlarge.

Look at the bottom line in the chart. Investing in PQRST through the 401(k) pays almost 42% better than investing in a taxable account. That's a way better advantage than the 26% we saw in Scenario 1.


canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
As I wrote about the contribution limits for 401(k)s rising in 2023 a few weeks ago I was reminded that a lot of people don't understand the benefit of 401(k)s. I mean, I think most American adults understand it at a high level: "Investing money in a 401(k) saves on taxes, so you have more money at the end." But understanding the details of how that works— and how much it benefits them— is squishy. I get it; the math1 can seem intimidating. Even for many people well educated in math or engineering it's too much to figure out. That leads to a lot of people not participating in 401(k) programs when they should. For example, many of my colleagues. 😳

I'll walk you through the math with a simple illustration. This will show you how much you can gain by investing through a 401(k) instead of an ordinary account. I call it the Tax-Deferred Advantage.

Here are five basic assumptions for my example:

  1. Let's suppose you invest your money in company XYZ, which enjoys stock price appreciation averaging 7% a year over the course of many years. To keep this example simple let's assume XYZ does not pay a dividend or distribution. This is a little unusual as most companies, over 80% of the names in the S&P 500 index, pay dividends; and virtually all mutual funds pay distributions. This assumption keeps the tax calculations simple.

  2. Let's suppose your overall marginal tax bracket is 28%. This includes both federal and state/local taxes, so think of it as 22% federal plus 6% state/local, or 24% federal plus 4% state/local, etc.

  3. You start with $10,000, pre-tax, to invest.

  4. You "buy and hold" XYZ — no trading until you're ready to withdraw. (This also keeps the example simpler.)

  5. We'll look at the totals after 20 years.


Case A: You invest via traditional investment account. You start by paying taxes on that $10k. Your investment in XYZ is thus $7,200 ($10k less 28% combined tax). Twenty years later your account value is $27,862. (This is $7.2k x 1.07^20.) When you withdraw the money you pay tax... but only on the gain of $20,662. Your net after taxes is $22,076.

Case B: You invest via a 401(k). You pay no taxes on the $10k up front because it's tax-deferred. All $10 goes into buying shares of XYZ company. Twenty years later it's worth $38,697. When you withdraw the money you pay taxes on the whole amount. After taxes you net $27,862.

So, how did we do? The 401(k) gave us 26% more money ($27,862 vs. $22,076) after 20 years. That's the Tax-Deferred Advantage!

And BTW, the advantage gets even bigger when you change some of the model's assumptions. For example, if your investment pays dividends or distributions, the advantage is even bigger. If your tax bracket is lower in retirement than your working years, the advantage is bigger, too. I'll show examples of these in a later blog as the math gets more complicated.


1: Insert curmudgeonly math joke: "That's not even math, it's arithmetic. If it were math it'd have letters!"

canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
The contribution limit for 401(k) accounts is increasing for 2023. The government has upped the individual contribution limit a whopping $2,000, from $20,500 to $22,500. The catch-up contribution limit for employees 50+ rises $1k to $7,500. That means for me, as a 50+ person, I get to jam an additional $3k in my account next year.

New 401(k) limits... Time to get STUFFED!

Yes, I'm maxing out my 401(k) contributions. Yes, I'm fortunate to be able to do that. Not everybody earns enough to save that much. Though frankly it's not just about how much you earn; there's also a choice one makes about how much to save. My partner and I made a choice years ago when our salaries reached a certain point well beyond our current expenses that we would not increase our expenses (say, by buying a larger, expensive house, as so many of our friends did) just because "we could afford it" but instead would save aggressively to afford ourselves a comfortable retirement.


canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
Hawaii April Travelog #22
Kailua-Kona - Tue, 12 Apr, 2022, 9pm

This evening we met up with friends over dinner in Kailua-Kona, 30 miles south of our condo in Waikoloa. Dave and his wife, "Lila" own a condo down there and are part time residents. They made reservations for the four of us at Magic's Beach Grill, an unassuming looking place on the ground floor of a small hotel overlooking the rocky coast and a nearby beach. Though the decor and service were casual the food was excellent. And the views were pretty good, too, especially because Dave and Lila have been there enough times to know not to reserve a table on the outdoors deck. Wind-whipped showers in the early evening tend to soak them!

Over dinner we talked about retirement, particularly about how Dave and Lila stay busy. They've got a combination of low-key activities they do together plus a few hobbies they enjoy individually.

One of the challenges with living on the island of Hawaii is that in many respects it's country living. Lila noted that the island is the size of Connecticut with a population of only 200,000. There aren't lots of stores— or restaurants. (They made our dinner reservation well in advance. 😅) There also isn't enough medical care. That's part of why they're part time residents. ...Not that they have crazy health needs. Just getting a general dental appointment involves an insane wait.

Another challenge of living on any island is "island fever". Even the Big Island is a small place, and you can get bored of it quickly. Let alone the island of Oahu, which is physically smaller even though it has a population of nearly 1 million. Anyone thinking of retiring, or even just relocating, to Hawaii needs to plan in their budget travel to other places. ...And that travel means flying a minimum of 2,500 miles east or 4,000 miles west to reach practically anything else.

We split up around 8 or 8:30. Hawk and I were getting tired, and Lila had to pack for a trip in the morning... she's returning to the Bay Area for a few weeks to catch up with friends, see some shows, etc.

Kona so White

One interesting thing Hawk and I noticed before, during, and after dinner today is that the island of Hawaii doesn't look like Oahu, demographically. On Oahu there are a lot of ethnic Hawaiians. Even in the tourist areas like Waikiki you see a lot of ethnic Hawaiians: they're working most of the jobs in all the hotels, restaurants, and stores. And outside Waikiki, in the more residential areas, the locals are predominantly Hawaiian.

Here on the Big Island, especially on the Kona side (west coast), it's different. You see ethnic Hawaiians working in the tourist industry but they're only about half of the workforce. There are a lot of White Americans here, too. And residential areas are full of White Americans, particularly older White Americans. This part of the state feels like a combination tourist/ex-pat retiree area.


canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
Read almost any article about 401(k) retirement plans in the US and you'll see negatives in the story if not in the headline. Americans aren't taking advantage of their 401(k) plans, they're not saving enough in them, they're missing out on company matching funds, they're given weak investing choices or choose under-performing funds, etc. Using 401(k)s has never been an issue in our household; we've invested in them since we were first eligible. And for at least the past 15 years we've been saving robustly. But we're not all equally interested in spending time to figure out which funds to invest them money in. I enjoy that research; Hawk does not.

This issue came up again several weeks ago when we compiled an end-of-year checkpoint on all our assets. Hawk noted, "Uh-oh, I never figured out which fund to put my money in at my current employer." As she started there 3½ years ago I was worried, too, about money languishing in an under-performing fund.

Dealing with issue waited another few weeks. Again, while I'm always interested in doing financial research, Hawk hates it. And since it's her retirement money, her retirement account, I can't just do it for her. I can look over her shoulder and help out, but she's still got to allocate a modicum of time and energy for the task.

Well, that was easy!Long story short, it turns out there was no reason to worry. Her money (from this employer, at least) is invested in a good fund. And it didn't even take a lot of effort. It was like pressing the proverbial Easy Button.

Longer version of the story:

As I saw where her money was invested, in a T. Rowe Price Target Date fund, I recalled that our conversation 3½ years ago went something like:

H: Ugh, I hate having to pick how to invest my 401(k) money.

Me: How many choices are there?

H: More than 20. I don't have time for this.

Me: Let's see if there's a quick reasonable answer to choose for now, then you can revisit it in a few weeks.

H: What about these target date funds? 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035; there's, like, 10 of them.

Me: Sure. Pick one for 10-15 years after you think you'll retire.

Target Date funds aren't always the best choice. They're mixtures of basic stock index funds and bonds, with the ratio between the two weighting more heavily to bonds the nearer the target date. The ratios are too bond heavy for people in our situation. That's why I recommended she pick a target date 10-15 years later than what general advice recommends. But even with that, there's the problem that the underlying stock funds can be are average at best.

So Many Choices

Once Hawk logged in to her account I started looking through the investment choices to find something better than her Target Date fund. There were a lot of choices there; at least 20. I know that level of choice intimidates a lot of people. One of my own colleagues described throwing his hands up in exasperation at the 20+ choices in our company plan. He decided not to fund his 401(k) at all! The problem of too much choice being a bad thing is real.

In this case, though, the "easy button" choice of a Target Date fund turned out to be a good one. As I studied the performance statistics of the other fund choices over the past 1, 3, and 5 year intervals, I found that none of them beat her years-away Target Date fund.

Part of that I credit to the nature of the stock market the past few years. First, big growth stocks were frothy, so funds that invested in the few biggest names did well while others languished. Then, in the last month, the big growth names have taken a hit, so those once high-flying funds have come back down to earth. There's a bit of the "Slow and steady wins the race" lesson here.

The other part of the Target Date fund's victory I attribute to it being a T. Rowe Price fund. They have a very strong fund offering, with strong teams of researchers balancing return vs. risk of the stocks they pick. Not all Target Date funds are as good as theirs. I know in the past I've looked at Target Date funds in my plans and thought, "Meh."

My funds need a change!

Next, out of curiosity, I compared the Target Date fund Hawk is in to the best funds I'd already chosen in my 401(k) plan. That was an eye-opener, because I realized one of the 3 funds I've got my money in has performed poorly over the last 12 months! 😨 Comparing to the Target Date fund really highlighted that problem. One of the three clearly beats the Target Date fund, and the other was stronger than it for a few years but only neck-and-neck the past 12 months. I immediately moved my money out of the under-performer and into a new fund that's come on strong in the past year.


canyonwalker: Mr. Moneybags enjoys his wealth (money)
My company has finally instituted a 401(k) match! A lot of people take these for granted, but in smaller companies— which I've worked at since 2004— they're uncommon. In fact I haven't had one at any of the small companies I've worked at until now.

Maxing out my retirement savings!The deal is a 100% match on the first $4,000 contributed annually. Oddly the matching starts with the first payroll in November. I mean, hey, the sooner the better.... But starting it late in the year is a rough fit for me because I've been funding my 401(k) to hit the maximum contribution for the year. I don't have $4,000 of eligible contributions left with which to max out my company's match.

I'm determined to get as much as I can, though. I stopped my contributions a few weeks ago, as soon as I was told about the benefit change. I planning to restart 401(k) contributions in November, when matching begins. If all goes well I'll be able to get about $3,000 of matching money in what's left of 2021 and then the full $4k next year.


Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 02:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios