canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
It's not often that TV shows get science right. In fact it's downright rare. Even rarer still is a TV miniseries that teaches a class in nuclear physics in its finale. Episode 5 of Chernobyl (2019) did just that. With visual aids printed in Russian, no less.

Valery Legasov (Jared Harris) gives a nuclear physics lesson in "Chernobyl" (2019)

In the miniseries finale, respected scientist Valery Legasov, played by actor Jared Harris, presents a step-by-step scientific explanation of what went wrong in the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (as best as a scientific consensus is able to reconstruct it). It's clear, lucid, and compelling— quite possibly the best bit of science I've seen in a dramatic TV show or movie, ever. Alas it's also not real.

What's not real about it is that the scene portrayed never happened.

In the show, Legasov testifies at a Soviet trial for 3 of the plant managers, Anatoly Dyatlov, Viktor Bryukhanov, and Nokolai Fomin. His explanation highlights three things: 1) the unconscionable things the three defendants did wrong that led to the explosion, 2) the how-to that explains the question, "How does an RBMK reactor explode?" which many people didn't believe was possible, and 3) how reactor design defects known about years earlier and covered up by the Soviet Union also played a key role in the explosion.

So, what's the gap between truth and fiction?

— What's true is  that the trial actually happened. It was in 1987, as shown in the episode, and oddly was held at a converted gymnasium in Chernobyl, which was still radioactive— also shown in the episode. The three defendants in the episode were the actual three men tried there. And while historical footage from the trial is carefully gated by the former Soviet Union, the words and demeanors of the defendants are as accurate as publicly known.

— What's fiction is that Legasov wasn't there. The Soviets didn't need him. They didn't need to have a scientist explain the science to a jury (there was no jury) or even a judge to convict the defendants. It was a show trial, with guilty verdicts the foregone conclusion. The series shows that, too, BTW.

So why add drama-Legasov to the trial scene? I see two good reasons, both of which relate to the need to compress the timeline when telling a narrative story.

— First, it's an important narrative element to explain to viewers the science of what happened. What drama-Legasov elucidates in this scene is information that basically dribbled out of the secretive Soviet Union over the course of several years.

— Second, it compresses the timeline of the story arc of Valery Legasov's last 18 months of life. During that time in real life Legasov became increasingly vocal within the Soviet Union about the defects in the reactor design— a design which many reactors were built from. He suffered professional harm as powerful state leaders and colleagues who kowtowed to the state increasingly marginalized him. In the narrative this is all compressed into half an episode that takes place over the course of a few days.

The series ends where it began, ten months after the trial, on April 26, 1988, at 1:23:45am. It's two years to the minute after the Chernobyl explosion, the worst nuclear disaster in history. Legasov hangs himself. His suicide calls attention to the warnings he'd been struggling to get out. The scientific community takes renewed interest in what he had to say. That, sadly, is real— that it took his death to galvanize people into paying attention.

Rest in peace, Valery Legasov.


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
In my previous blog about the HBO series Chernobyl I wrote about "The Cost of Lies, The Futility of Truth". Scientist Valery Legasov led the Soviet delegation at a UN IAEA conference held in Vienna in August 1986. As I noted previously Legasov shaded the truth. He not only left out of his report the fact of design flaws in the design of the Soviet RBMK 1000 reactor, of which there were at least a dozen other copies still running, but denied it repeatedly when asked by international scientists and journalists. When the facts of this came out a few years later the IAEA rewrote its report, holding design flaws rather than operator error the chief cause of the explosion. Yet despite his dishonesty he was lauded as a hero at the time by the world.

How was it that he was praised so much while misleading the world?

Valery Legasov presenting a report on Chernobyl to the IAEA in Vienna, Aug 1986 (file photo)
Valery Legasov— the real Legasov, not the actor in the 2019 HBO miniseries— at the UN IAEA conference on Chernobyl in Austria in August 1986


Understand that expectations for honesty from the USSR were low. Remember, the Soviets weren't even going to admit the reactor blew up in the first place. It was spewing as much radiation as the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki every 12 hours, and they didn't want to tell anyone. They only admitted it 2½ days later after a nuclear power plant in Sweden over 600 miles away detected the radiation.

Interesting aside: As I understand it, an alarm at the Swedish Forsmark plant was triggered when radiation was detected on a plant employee's shoe. The employee was arriving at the plant, though; so authorities knew the radiation source was outside the plant.

And even once the Soviets admitted something happened at Chernobyl they downplayed it. They said only that "an accident occurred" that "damaged" one of the reactors. The rest of the world only understood how bad it was from measuring the radioactive fallout across Western and Northern Europe and from observing the site & activity around it through spy satellites and other forms of secret intelligence.

Plus, when the Soviets did acknowledge a problem at Chernobyl, they followed their brief & vague description with a whataboutism screed criticizing Three Mile Island and other nuclear accidents in Western countries. This approach of deny, distract, counterattack was a standard technique of Soviet propaganda. Back in the late '80s and early 90s books on communication styles referred to them as "Soviet-style negotiation". If these techniques seem familiar now it's because Donald Trump has used them publicly pretty much every day since he announced his first run for the presidency in 2015.

So yeah, Legasov was more forthcoming than expected at Vienna— but still didn't say anything other countries hadn't already figured out. Western European nations were measuring radiation in their own countries. Scientists could extrapolate from that how bad the situation must be. And spy satellites confirmed additional details. Legasov's presentation was remarkable primarily that he didn't deny the obvious facts. But still it made him unpopular with many of his peers & many government officials back home.

People who remember that era in Soviet relations might say, "Well, wasn't there Glasnost going on?" Although General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev mentioned glasnost (literally, "openness") when he became chief executive in 1985 it wasn't until 1986— specifically after August 1986— that he spoke of it as actual policy direction. It's believed that it was through seeing the handling of the Chernobyl cleanup and communication with the world community that Gorbachev recognized it was crucial to do to preserve the country's remaining power.



canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
It's been a few days since I wrote about the HBO miniseries Chernobyl. I was hoping to be done with it before we leave on a short holiday vacation tomorrow. It looks like that's not going to happen now. Anyway, I left off on Monday with Liquidators, Robots, and Bio-Robots, which was about the extended cleanup after stabilizing the still-highly radioactive exposed reactor core. That covered most of the way through episode 4 of the 5 episode series.

Episode 4 ends with an interesting private conversation between the three main characters Valery Legasov, Boris Shcherbina, and Ulana Khomyuk. It's part of a plot thread that's not resolved until early in episode 5, so I wanted to finish everything else from ep. 4 first.

The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) convened a conference in Vienna, Austria, in August 1986 to discuss the Chernobyl disaster. Legasov would be the lead scientific representative from the USSR... and thus the person in the "hot seat" who'll have to answer— or conspicuously not answer— the world's concerns about the reactor explosion.

Legasov discusses plans with Shcherbina and Khomyuk in HBO's "Chernobyl" (2019)

In this well-acted conversation Legasov wavers on how much of the truth to tell. Part of him totally wants to tell the truth, including the very inconvenient truth that there are design defects in the widely used reactor architecture the Soviets have known about for years and covered up. Another part of him frets that it'd be futile. If he exposes too much embarrassing information the state will deny it and discredit him and nothing will get fixed.

Shcherbina and Khomyuk play the demon and angel on Legasov's shoulders. Khomyuk appeals to his morality: if he allows the truth to remain secret, the USSR will keep running numerous existing reactors just like Chernobyl and building new ones, and operators won't know how to avoid the problems that caused the explosion. Shcherbina isn't opposed to telling the truth, per se, but warns of the risks. Not only will the state deny it and discredit Legasov if he goes public with the information in Austria, they'll punish him. He could get a bullet. Best case, prison. And his family and friends would be punished, too. Shcherbina recommends addressing the design problems through internal channels; Khomyuk points out that internal channels already failed.

Ultimately Legasov threads the needle at Vienna. He tells way more of the truth than the international community expects from the USSR. In particular he's frank about gross mistakes made by the operators. At the same time, he holds back enough to keep the Central Party satisfied and not embarrass the Soviet system as dysfunctional or dishonest. He doesn't talk about the design flaws or gaps in training and documentation. This leads the IAEA in its report to place the blame fully on terrible mistakes by plant operators and sets up dramatic tension for Legasov's character in the 5th episode as he grapples with knowing that the design flaws must be talked about more widely or they'll be swept back under the rug— allowing more accidents on the scale of Chernobyl to occur.

 

canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
The fourth episode of HBO's five-part miniseries Chernobyl is mostly about liquidators. They were the 400,000 - 700,000 men (nearly all were men) conscripted to clean up in the exclusion zone. They came in once the destroyed nuclear reactor was at least stabilized so as not to risk causing imminent additional explosions and the region was evacuated— though some residents were... reluctant... to leave.

Liquidators had a variety of tasks. One big effort was to till all the soil in the exclusion zone, burying the radioactive dirt so it wouldn't be exposed to dusting or runoff. Another, which I wrote about in my previous blog on the movie, was to kind and kill all the abandoned pets in the zone. Other combed through fields and streams looking for irradiated items that had been carried away from near the reactor and then abandoned. But the most dangerous jobs were at the reactor itself. While the open core had been rendered safe from further imminent explosion it was still highly radioactive.

In particular, there was radioactive debris on the roofs of several connected buildings in the power plant. Among these was the roof of reactor 3. Yes, there was another reactor right next to the one that exploded— and it was still running. (In fact the last of the 3 remaining reactors at Chernobyl didn't shut down until 2000.)The radioactive debris needed to be removed because it was a danger to the environment in general and to remaining plant workers in particular.

At first the Soviets deemed the roof areas too dangerous for people to work in. The debris on the roof of reactor building 3 emitted such intense radiation a person would absorb a fatal dose in less than 2 minutes standing there. Thus they sent robots to clean the roof.

The robots were basically remote-operated bulldozers. They were meant to collect radioactive debris and sweep it off the edge of the roof, into the pile around the core of reactor 4. But the radiation there was too intense. Ionizing radiation at the level of 10,000-15,000 Roentgen/hour or higher quickly fried the control circuitry of every robot brought in.

Thus the Soviets turned to bio-robots.

Chernobyl liquidators on the roof - HBO miniseries (2019) and reality (1986)
3,828 "Bio-Robots"— aka people— cleared 90% of the radioactive debris from the roof. The side-by-side picture shows a scene from the HBO miniseries (left) and a file photo from 1986 (right).

Bio-robots, as you might have guessed, is a euphemism for people. But that's what they called it. Bio-robots People cleared 90% of the debris from the roofs.

The areas still were highly radioactive. Leaders determined that a liquidator could spend just 90 seconds on the roof. And that wasn't "90 seconds, then you're done for the day"; it was "90 seconds, then you're done with radiation for your entire life. Don't come back." But records show some workers did go back out on the roof for a second or even third sortie.

Per records there were 3,828 bio-robots at Chernobyl. Every one of them is a brave soul as they had to work with minimal protection. And those who went back a second or third time beyond the call of duty are especially selfless.

Next in this series: The Cost of Lies, the Futility of Truth



canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
The fourth episode of HBO's five-part miniseries Chernobyl introduces us to liquidators. That's the name used for the half-million-plus soldiers and conscripts who were sent to the Chernobyl exclusion zone to clean up the area after the nuclear fire at the exploded reactor was mostly put out. (The material in and around the open reactor was still highly radioactive, though.) I'm told the word has a less-sinister connotation in Russian, where it means something more like "clean up crew", versus the modern English euphemism for contract killers.

One narrative thread about the liquidators' work is told from the viewpoint Pavel, a young conscript (center in the picture below). Pavel's story comes from a real-life account in Svetlana Alexievich's book, Voices from Chernobyl.

Three Chernobyl "liquidators" in the HBO miniseries "Chernobyl" (2019)

Pavel arrives at a squalid camp near the exclusion zone with no idea what he'll be doing other than being a Chernobyl liquidator— whatever that means. When he finds his assigned group tent he meets Bacho (left, above), a tough soldier who served in the Soviet army in Afghanistan.

Bacho takes Pavel under his wing and quickly explains their crew's assignment. They comb through empty villages in the exclusion zone to kill all the abandoned pets. The animals are abandoned because when people were evacuated they were told to leave all pets behind. Now the animals are poisoned with radiation and must be killed for humanitarian reasons— and to prevent irradiated animals from spreading beyond the zone.

Bacho explains the tactics to Pavel with ruthless efficiency. Pets see humans as providers of food, so the liquidators don't need to go door-to-door looking for them in every single apartment. All they have to do it walk down the streets making noise, and the pets will come to them. Shoot them when they get close. Once animals hear gunshots, though, they may run in fright back to their homes. Then the liquidators follow them inside.

Liquidators Pavel and Bacho in the HBO miniseries

Pavel struggles with the morality of doing this. He's an 18 year old kid from the city, freshly conscripted. Bacho is a grizzled veteran of the brutal Soviet-Afghan war so he's not troubled by it. He does have a strong moral code, though: Don't let the animals suffer. Shoot to kill, when they're close. If one's not killed right away, shoot it again. He doesn't want anyone to let an animal to suffer. He threatens to shoot anyone who does.

Even so, Pavel struggles with the assignment. And as if shooting the animals weren't bad enough, these liquidators must also gather the bodies for burial. They have to chase the animals if they run, throw the corpses into the back of their truck, take them to a mass burial site, and dump them in. The pile of dead pets is then covered over with concrete.

Liquidators sit beneath a banner, "Our goal is the happiness of all mankind" in "Chernobyl" (2019)

Pavel discusses how to find peace with this assignment when the crew sits down for a field lunch at an abandoned civic center. The banner still hanging from the building proclaims, "Our Goal is the Happiness of All Mankind." This scene is created directly from accounts in Alexievich's book and helps frame the absurdity of the whole situation.

Next blog about ChernobylLiquidators, Robots, and Bio-Robots


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
The fourth episode of HBO's miniseries Chernobyl (2019) is entitled "The Happiness of All Mankind". It's a slogan from a propaganda banner left hanging at a civic center in one of the towns in the exclusion zone near Chernobyl that were evacuated after the nuclear reactor explosion. Showrunner Craig Mazin notes that the banner is described in first-hand accounts from liquidators as described in Svetlana Alexievich's book, Voices from Chernobyl.

"Liquidators" are what the hundreds of thousands of men sent to Chernobyl in the weeks and months after the explosion called themselves. If "liquidators" sounds more ominous than "cleanup crew"... well, it is. I'll get to that in a subsequent blog.

First I want to write about the opening scene of episode 4. Soldiers are evacuating people from the 30km exclusion zone. Not everyone wants to go.

An old woman refuses to evacuate in "Chernobyl" (2019)In this scene one soldier confronts a babushka who doesn't want to leave. Babushka, BTW, is a transliteration of the Russian word for grandmother. It appears in Polish, too, as a borrowed word. It's used in both languages more loosely than in English as a term for any older woman.

Babushka doesn't want to leave. The soldier tells she must and explains it's for her own safety. She refuses again, giving a litany of all the deadly hardships she's lived through on this land: the Bolshevik revolution, Stalin, the Holodomor, World War II, etc.

While she's arguing with the soldier she continues milking her cow. The soldier grabs the milk pail from her, steps outside the barn, and pours it out on the ground. BTW, the soldier is not doing this to punish her for disobedience. The reality is cows in this region are eating irradiated grass, and their milk is dangerously irradiated. It's poisonous to drink. That's why people have to be evacuated.

But the babushka is undeterred. She picks up the empty bucket, sets it back under the cow, and starts milking again.

The soldier, seemingly in a fit of anger and her stubborn disobedience, pulls out his pistol. We hear the BANG! of a shot— followed by WHUMPF! as the body hits the ground.

Spoiler! (Open to read more...) )

It's worth calling out a word the babushka used in this scene. A single word. Holodomor. The miniseries doesn't explain it but instead leaves it there like a clue, an easter egg for curious people to use as the starting point for further research. And OMG, what a terrible easter egg. Holodomor was a genocide Stalin perpetrated against the people of Ukraine in the early 1930s by starving them. It's estimated that up to 5 million people died.

For this episode, for this scene, that background puts into better context why a person who lived through that isn't afraid of invisible radiation or a soldier with a pistol.

Next: Find out what else they shoot in Our Goal is the Happiness of All Mankind



canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
The title of the third episode of HBO's miniseries Chernobyl, "Open Wide, O Earth", would seem to describe the valiant efforts of coal miners ordered to dig a tunnel under the destroyed reactor to prevent a China Syndrome disaster. I see a second meaning in the title. Burying the dead is often described poetically as the final embrace of the earth. Episode three shows how the plant engineers and emergency workers who suffered fatal doses of radiation in the immediate aftermath of the explosion were buried.

Radiation victims are buried in metal coffins entombed in concrete in "Chernobyl" (2019)

Approximately 30 people died from severe Acute Radiation Sickness (ARS). They were buried in metal-lined coffins that were welded shut. Concrete was then poured around the coffins. The reason for this is that the bodies of the dead were considered highly radioactive. Scientists disagree about how radioactive the body of a person who's absorbed a large dose of radiation is... particularly a few weeks after exposure.

It's worth elaborating on "a few weeks after exposure". Most of the people who died from severe ARS did not die immediately or within hours. Instead they died 2-3 weeks later. That's way worse, because those 2-3 weeks are excruciating. The episode showed that progression with a few of the characters introduced in episode 1.

ARS progresses in basically 3 stages. The first stage outwardly resembles burn trauma. The skin is reddened, or in severe cases, blackened; there may be swelling and lesions. It's painful.

In the second stage the surface burns subside. Patients would seem to be on the mend... but they're not. Internally, the radiation has killed bone marrow, destroyed the immune system, and killed cells in vital organs.

In the third stage these symptoms manifest externally. Flesh rots. Organs fail. Bacterial and viral infections run rampant. The pain is immense, and things are going wrong faster than modern medicine can keep up.

I mentioned that episode revisits some of the characters from the first episode: Ignatenko, Toptunov, and Akimov. They've all been moved to a hospital in Moscow for special treatment.

Ignatenko, the firefighter, has burns all over his body. He can't move and can barely speak. Light hurts his eyes. He's moved to an isolation tent before he dies. The scenes dramatized in the series come from accounts of his wife, who spent time at his hospital bedside.

Toptunov, one of the control room engineers, has his face practically melted off. The show is careful to show this only briefly so as not to verge into making "horror porn" out of a real-life tragedy. The description that his facial features were melted off comes from written and oral accounts of people who saw him in the hospital.

Akimov is the worst off of the three. The directors decided not even to show his condition directly. Instead they showed a scientist interviewing him. Her look of horror conveys a lot. Historical records indicate that his body was basically charred black, like coal— and that was days before he died.

My next blog in this series: The Happiness of All Mankind


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
Episode 2 of the HBO miniseries Chernobyl ended on a cliffhanger. Three engineers headed into flooded tunnels beneath destroyed reactor 4 to open sluice gates. These valves need to be opened to drain huge water tanks that could cause an enormous explosion if molten nuclear core material burned through them. The engineers were moving through dark, flooded corridors, with only flashlights to guide them, their Geiger counters clicking away like mad... and then all of their flashlights failed!

Engineers open sluice gates below the damaged reactor in "Chernobyl" (2019)

Episode 3, Open Wide O Earth, shows how the "divers" complete their mission successfully— and live to tell about it. In the HBO series they have hand-cranked flashlights as backups. They move quickly to valves, open them, then back to the surface. An account from one of the engineers acknowledges that their flashlights died... but does not mention backups. He says they navigated in the dark! That's why it was critical the men sent for this job were intimately familiar with the layout of the plant. Although they're referred to as "divers" they were plant engineers.

BTW, it was widely believed these three men suffered such strong radiation doses that they died not long after. That's not true! They were treated at hospitals and released. One of the men died of a heart attack in 2005, nearly 19 years later. The other two are apparently still alive today!

The engineer-divers weren't the only people who braved hard, deadly conditions to prevent a wider tragedy at Chernobyl. After the water tanks were drained there remained another peril. If the nuclear core melted down through the (dry) tanks and then through the concrete pad beneath it would reach groundwater eventually, causing an explosion and an enormous cloud of radioactive particulates. This is the so-called China Syndrome.

To prevent a China Syndrome, Legasov and other scientists planned to build a heat exchanger beneath the concrete pad under the reactor. Getting underneath the concrete meant tunneling in from the side. For this they needed the best diggers in the Soviet Union.

Coal miners dug a tunnel beneath the damaged reactor in "Chernobyl" (2019)

Some 400 coal miners were recruited for the digging. It had to be done by hand— no power machines— because of the delicate situation. The miners toiled in harsh conditions, where temperatures in the tunnel were up to 130° F (50° C), and of course radiation levels were high. The fates of the miners is not known as the Soviets kept few to no records of their health, and the USSR in 1988 made it unlawful for doctors to record radiation sickness as a cause of death, but it's estimated that 1/4 of them suffered early deaths.

The stories of the divers and the miners, along with the firefighters in episode 1, are stories of heroic sacrifice. Some had no idea of the danger they faced while many knew it was likely a death writ; yet person after person put themselves at risk to prevent harm to countless others.

Making the story of the miners even more bittersweet is that ultimately the heat exchanger was never built. The core cooled down enough that it no longer threatened to burn through the lower concrete shield and trigger the China Syndrome. Scientists like Legasov were aware of that possibility, though. Part of their tragedy was knowing that there was only a chance of some of these really terrible outcomes happening, yet having to send courageous men to sacrifice themselves just to prevent that chance.

Keep reading: Burying the Dead


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
During my first watch-through of the HBO miniseries Chernobyl I found the actors' accents jarring. It's not that they're speaking English with Russian accents that are hard to understand; it's that they're not speaking with Russian accents. They're speaking with British and Irish accents. It's like watching Star Wars Game of Thrones! Plus, the senior party apparatchik in Pripyat is Maester Luwin from Winterfell.

In the episode 1 podcast showrunner Craig Mazin explains his deliberate choice not to have the actors speak with Russian accents. He notes that even professional actors tend to "act the accent". He didn't want actors subconsciously hamming up a Russian stereotype, turning the show into a self parody a la "Boris and Natasha". Moreover, he explained, he wanted the actors to be able to convey emotions clearly with their voices. It's harder to do that when they're struggling to portray foreign accents.

Mazin still wanted it to sound foreign to US audiences, though. He cast primarily English, Scottish, and Irish actors. By the third episode their accents stopped breaking me out of the moment... except for the few additional times actors used British idioms.

Keep reading: Open Wide, O Earth



canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
In the climax of Chernobyl miniseries episode 2, "Please Remain Calm", scientist Khomyuk has warned lead scientist Legasov that his plan to put out the nuclear fire in the open core has a fatal flaw. The water tanks below the core are full, not empty. The core will remain hot even as it's buried with sand and boron (in an attempt to stop it from spewing radioactive material into the air). If the core melts down through the concrete and steel pad to the water tanks, it will flash all that water to steam, causing an explosion potentially big enough to damage the other three reactors at the plant. The water needs to be drained out of the tank. Fast.

The rub? The control systems in reactor #4 were all broken by the explosion, so the valves to drain the tanks need to be opened manually. They are underground, in an area flooded with radioactive water, in the dark. Three plant workers familiar with the layout need to go down there to open the valves. It's believed that this task will be fatal, due to radiation exposure— but is necessary to prevent a tragedy that could kill and injure vastly more people.


Link: YouTube video (2:18)

In the HBO miniseries, three workers volunteer. The clip above shows them responding to a gruff speech by Shcherbina, appealing to national pride to put the wellbeing of the country ahead of one's own life. One by one, they stand. "Ananenko." "Bespalov." "Baranov," they announce their names.

It's disputed whether the men actually volunteered. One eye-witness account holds that they were volun-told. "It's not like you could say no," the witness quipped.


The episode ends with the three men descending into the bowels of the plant. They're wading through chest deep water. Their Geiger counters are clicking like mad. Then one man's flashlight dies, followed shortly by the other two. The episode ends with all three left in the dark, the only sounds being their frantic breathing over the rapid clicking of the Geiger counters.

This cliffhanger ending is one of the reasons we stayed up until 2am to binge-watch all 5 episodes in one sitting.

Next in this series: Those Accents, Tho!


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
The second episode of the 2019 HBO miniseries Chernobyl is entitled, "Please Remain Calm". It relates key parts of the story from 6 hours to 36 hours after the nuclear power plant explosion. During that time a team is assembles to lead efforts to understand what's happened with the explosion and contain its dangers. These are the main characters through the rest of the miniseries.

Dr. Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina in "Chernobyl" (2019)

Two of these main characters are Dr. Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina (pictured above, left and right). Legasov, portrayed by Jared Harris, is a respected scientist and deputy director of the Kurchatov Institute. Shcherbina, portrayed by Stellan Skarsgård, is deputy chairman of the council of ministers, picked by Gorbachev and seniormost party leaders to coordinate this effort.

Legasov and Shcherbina's first scene together is a rocky one. Legasov has been invited to a briefing with Secretary General Gorbachev and a dozen senior officials. Shcherbina gives a briefing full of bullshit passed up to the chain to him by the craven plant managers who've basically lied their asses off (we saw this in the first episode, 1:23:45) about the extent of the accident. Shcherbina is an unwitting accessory to the lies because he's not educated on nuclear physics. But that's why Legasov is there.

Legasov smells the proverbial rat moments before the briefing by spotting key details in the written brief document. He basically explodes during the cabinet meeting when the accident is written off as "well under control", warning Gorbachev and all the ministers that the accident is likely far, far worse than reported. He argues there's likely been a core breach. Gorbachev and all the ministers are displeased with this news and the way in which it's delivered... but as Gorbachev says partly in criticizing him, "All I hear are suspicions and no facts." He instructs Shcherbina and Legasov to go to Chernobyl in person to find the facts.

Those two men aren't the only ones finding facts early on. Before we see Legasov and Shcherbina on-screen in this episode we meet the miniseries's third main character, Dr. Ulana Khomyuk. She's deputy director at the Byelorussian Institute for Nuclear Physics in Minsk

Character Dr. Ulana Khomyuk in "Chernobyl" (2019)

The episode actually opens with Khomyuk in one of her labs. It's Saturday morning, and only she and one of her research staffers are there. They open a window for fresh air... and a radiation alarm in the lab triggers immediately. She quickly collects a swab from the dust on the outside of the window and analyzes it with a spectrometer. The primary isotope is Iodine 131— a fission byproduct of Uranium 235, which could only come from a nuclear reactor's exposed core. With a bit of telephone sleuthing she determines the problem's at Chernobyl, over 400km away.

While Legasov and Shcherbina are real people who were key members of the team responding to the Chernobyl crisis, Khomyuk is fictional. Showrunner Craig Mazin emphasizes that she is a composite character, an amalgamation of the literally 100+ scientists who rushed or were sent to Chernobyl from across the Soviet Union. Introducing her makes it easier and more effective to tell the narrative.

It turns out Legasov, while very intelligent, is not actually the best person scientifically for the job. He's not a nuclear physicist! He's a physical chemist. He's distinguished and knows a lot about the behavior of radioactive materials, but he's not an expert on nuclear reactor design. Khomyuk knows reactors way better than he does, and points out a nearly fatal flaw in his plans later in this episode.

Keep readingThree Go Forth


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
What kind of a show do you call Chernobyl? The 2019 HBO miniseries isn't a documentary. It's not as... dry... nor does a narrator recite facts while a camera pans over photographs. Its Wikipedia page (external link) calls it a historical tragedy. That non-category includes too wide a variety to be meaningful. Chernobyl is not a costume drama. It's about something that really happened and it sticks relatively close to the facts. I think the best term is docudrama.

In the podcast made about episode 1 showrunner Craig Mazin talks about why he took the docu- part of that term seriously. He sees accuracy as a matter of respect for the people who died. And he noted that, stylistically, the first episode also matches another genre. Horror.

He's right. The first episode, 1:23:45, is very much like a horror film. There's a monster killing people. Worse, it's an invisible monster. But like in a horror movie, we know it's there even when (most of) the characters in the story don't. Worse than that, the monster kills its victims slowly. They absorb deadly doses without realizing it. They become dead men walking. Again, we know that before they do. We watch in suspense as people go around corners and open doors— and we're like, "Don't go there! The monster's there! It'll you!" But as is the trope in horror flicks, they do anyway. And the monster tags them for death.

The later episodes are different. The "monster" is still present but its dangers are better understood. But even a week later episode 1 haunts me. As it's quiet during the day at home, or quiet late at night, little creaks and groans around the house startle me. I know they're ordinary things like the thermostat switching the heater on, or pipes expanding with the heat. But every sound is creepy. My animal hind-brain asks, "What if something's going to blow up? What if the air we breathe is poisoned?"

In many ways knowing as much as I do makes it better. But in some ways knowing as much makes it worse.

Keep readingPlease Remain Calm


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
A week ago Hawk and I binged the HBO miniseries Chernobyl from 2019. We watched 5 hour-long episodes in a single sitting. That was more than we expected... because the show was more engrossing than we expected. But why even watch it at all? For both of us a big part of the reason was that this enormous accident happened during our lifetimes— yet we didn't know much about it.

I was a teenager when the accident occurred in April 1986, finishing up my freshman year of high school. I was old enough (and precocious enough) that I was following national and international news and forming opinions about it. Hawk was a couple years younger than me and also paying attention to things. And yet.... And yet, all we remember about Chernobyl is the very broadest strokes: A bad accident happened. The Soviets lied about how serious it was, until they couldn't. Then they cleaned it up. They built a concrete "sarcophagus" built around the ruins of the reactor and created an exclusion zone 60km across.

As a scientifically educated person I knew a bit more about the accident— but I learned those things only years after it, only by choosing to read about it when 99.9% of the world had moved on from caring about it, and had to struggle through excessively technical and poorly written descriptions to reach an understanding. I looked to the miniseries as an opportunity to better understand something that shaped the world I grew up in— and nearly did way worse than "shape" it. 😨

The Chernobyl Podcast featuring Craig Mazin and Peter Sagal (HBO, 2019)

After watching the 5 episodes of the miniseries I started watching some of the extras. Showrunner Craig Mazin did a series of podcasts, radio style interviews with NPR host Peter Sagal. In the podcast for episode 1 Mazin described how he started this project... and the reason he created it is the same reason I watched it!

In the podcast Mazin describes that the Chernobyl accident happened when he was about 15. He was aware of it at the time, but only in the broad strokes: a nuclear power plant accident occurred, Soviets lied about how bad it was until evidence made it undeniable, then they cleaned it up, then there was a sarcophagus and an exclusion zone. That's basically the same recollection I had, from a similar age!

Mazin also, like me, looked into details many years later. But Mazin looked at it with a filmmaker's eye rather than an engineer's eye. Meaning, he saw irony and drama. The irony was that technicians at the plant were running a safety test when the reactor core exploded. "It's like you're testing the brakes on your car," he explained (paraphrased), "But instead of slowing down your car zooms forward, catches fire, and crashes!" He knew there had to be a gripping story there.

And there is. Start with 1:23:45.

And keep reading after this: Chernobyl has serious horror movie energy.


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
Yesterday I wrote about 1:23:45, the first episode of HBO's 5-part miniseries Chernobyl. In that blog I addressed just the opening scene of the episode, a crackling monologue by scientist Valery Legasov. There's a lot more to the episode than just that scene, of course. Don't expect a ratio of 1 episode = 1 blog as I write about this miniseries. There's too much to unpack. Just episode 1 will stretch to at least 3 blogs.

While the episode starts with Legasov, portrayed by actor Jared Harris, who'll be the main character of the miniseries, it switches away from him after the opening few minutes. It does that with an arrangement that is very unusual for narrative storytelling. Episode 1 plot twist )

The show next introduces two minor recurring characters, Vasily and Lyudmilla Ignatenko. They are awakened in the middle of the night in their Pripyat apartment by the sudden explosion less than 2km away. They see the burning reactor through their window.

1:23:45, episode 1 of Chernobyl (2019, HBO)

Vasily is a firefighter and is shown in the poster for the episode. He knows he will be called to fight the fire so he starts getting ready. As we see later in the episode, the firefighters go right up to the wreckage of the exploded nuclear reactor. They are not afraid.

Of course, part of their fearlessness is ignorance. They literally don't know how dangerous it is. They've never been trained on what radioactivity is, despite working as emergency responders in an "atom city" devoted to staffing a nuclear power plant. The specific dangers of this accident haven't been explained either. The nuclear core has exploded, and radioactive material is literally on the ground at their feet as they carry hoses toward the fire, yet they've been told they're fighting a "roof fire" with burning tar.

The lies that left initially hundreds of people, and soon millions, unaware of mortal danger, started within seconds of the explosion. This is shown in the third scene of episode. In the control room plant operators are stunned by the explosion.

Operators in the control room of Chernobyl ep. 1, 1:23:45 (HBO, 2019)

In the control room we meet characters Anatoly Dyatlov (pictured above, played by Paul Ritter), Leonid Toptunov (pictured, background), and Aleksandr Akimov (not pictured). They're all a bit stunned. They're not sure what's happened. Dyatlov, the deputy chief engineer, goes immediately into damage control mode. And by "damage control" I mean personal damage control.

Dyatlov blames Akimov and Toptunov for screwing up even though they were a) following his orders, and b) nobody's even sure what's going on yet. Despite nobody in the control room being sure what's happened, Dyatlov asserts it's an explosion in one of the control tanks. As other operators stumble into the control room to report that, no, it's not the control tanks, it's the whole reactor core, he dismisses them as delusional.

Dyatlov also blocked objective information that would've indicated the dangerous nature of the situation. Radiation dosimeters carried by the operators reported 3.6 Roentgen/hour— a level that's series but not "OMG, run away!" But as various technicians pointed out, 3.6 was the top of the scale for those dosimeters. The techs wanted to get to meters with higher scales; Dyatlov shut that down as a waste of time. It should be a requirement for passing even high school science classes to know that when a meter is pegged at the top of its scale the true measurement is likely well above that level.

The lie of 3.6 took on a life of its own. Dyatlov reported it to the plant manager and chief engineer, who relayed it up through the bureaucracy all the way to Premier Mikhail Gorbachev, as well as to the local executive committee in Pripyat. 3.6 was key to the lie in that it was dangerous but not that dangerous. The local committee added to the situation of lies by deciding that the appropriate thing to do in this circumstance was to seal the city, so nobody could get out, and also cut the phone lines. It was an exercise in Orwellian doublethink to hold simultaneously that 1) the accepted "truth" isn't that bad yet 2) it's also so dangerous that it must be kept from people.

Thus, because information was suppressed, a number of people sacrificed themselves without realizing their danger in the moment. The firefighters took the brunt of it as they rushed in to a situation with false information and no protection.

There were instances of informed sacrifice, though. As the episode frames it, most of the operators in the plant knew what happened. Dyatlov was in denial for his own reasons, but most of the others figured it out from the information available. I mean, there was at least one person who entered the control room and said he saw the containment vessel destroyed. Others subsequently went and saw it themselves— knowing that even to look meant taking lethal doses of radiation. They knowingly walked to their own deaths believing that by doing so they would save countless other lives. Instead Dyatlov and his superiors rebuked them as liars when they confirmed reports of an open core and a full-on meltdown.

Update: keep reading: Why I watched Chernobyl - same as why Mazin created it!


canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
1:23:45 is not just a series of consecutive numbers. It is a time that will live in infamy. It is the hour (and minute and second) of the morning on April 26, 1986 when reactor #4 at the Chernobyl power plant in the former USSR exploded. It is also the title of episode 1 of Chernobyl, a 5-part HBO miniseries we binged last Friday.

Chernobyl, an HBO miniseries (2019)

Episode 1 begins with the main character of docudrama, scientist Valery Legasov, who had been appointed to lead scientific aspects of the cleanup and containment of the nuclear accident. It is 2 years after the explosion. Legasov is recording memoirs on audio tape about the true culprits of the disaster. "What is the cost of lies?" he asks rhetorically. He rails against the culture of lying, and knowingly repeating lies, when it's more politically expedient than acknowledging hard truths.

Though this opening scene takes place in 1988 there's an obvious parable for today, 34 years later. Lies, and whole political regimes that depend on constant lying, are very much a part of 2022, from modern day Russia with its absurd propaganda attempting to justify its invasion of Ukraine, to the US itself, where former president Donald Trump, other Republican leaders, and propagandist personalities on Fox News promote conspiracy theories daily.

Just over a week ago Merriam-Webster named gaslighting its Word of the Year. Gaslighting very much describes how Soviet officials began suppressing facts about Chernobyl beginning seconds after it occurred. It also describes what's happening politically in the US for several years. When Trump says things like, "Don't believe what the media is telling you; they're 'fake news'" that's gaslighting.

So, what is the cost of lies? As concerns Chernobyl, it was the explosion that blew up reactor #4, spewing radiation and radioactive material in greater quantities than the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was an accident that killed untold thousands, injured possibly hundreds of thousands, and put literal millions at risk.

As concerns the US, one cost of lies in the insurrection on January 6, 2021. It's chilling to note, though, that the miniseries wasn't talking specifically about that. The show aired in 2019, over a year before the insurrection. The show's opening soliloquy warns us about what could happen. Now some of it already has.

Update: keep reading: 1:23:45. Lies & Heroic Sacrifice.


Chernobyl

Dec. 3rd, 2022 06:10 pm
canyonwalker: Malign spirits in TV attempt to kill viewer (tv)
Last night Hawk and I watched the HBO miniseries Chernobyl. It's about about the 1986 nuclear accident at the Soviet power plant Chernobyl near the city of Pripyat in what is today Ukraine.

Chernobyl, an HBO miniseries (2019)

The miniseries aired in 2019. It's been on my watch list basically since then. As a scientifically educated person I've always been curious to learn more about what happened there. I knew from cursory reading years ago that the gist of it was that operators disabled or ignored multiple safety systems and protocols while running a horribly misconceived "experiment". I looked forward to learning more about it through this series critically acclaimed for its accuracy and depth of research.

Chernobyl spans five episodes, each about an hour long. We surprised ourselves by bingeing all five in one sitting Friday night, staying up until 2am Saturday. I'll post thoughts episode by episode soon.

Update: keep reading: 1:23:45. The Cost of Lies.

Profile

canyonwalker: wiseguy (Default)
canyonwalker

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 01:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios